Compare Vertical and Multiview - Jul 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Jul 13, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Vertical or Multiview?

Multiview is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Vertical, and Multiview is rated higher (93/100) than Vertical (82/100). Multiview offers users more features (19) than Vertical (0).

Looking for the right Field Service solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Vertical Market Software Vs. Multiview Financial Software

Vertical Market Software: Vertical Market Software (VMS) is a leading provider of integrated business management software to the construction and service markets. The hallmark of our success has always been a dedicated and knowledgeable support, training and development team that takes pride in knowing and understanding your business

Multiview Financial Software: Company Information The Multiview Experience First, welcome to the Multiview world of quality products, people and processes. Unlike the companies we compete against, Multiview is the manufacturer of our software. The benefit to client companies is Multiview controls all the processes, end to end, which leaves us a great deal of flexibility in ...

Who is more expensive? Vertical Market Software or Multiview?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Field Service software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Vertical Market Software and Multiview.

Vertical Market Software accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Vertical Market Software is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Field Service software. Multiview price starts at $150 per user/year , When comparing Multiview to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Field Service software cost.

Bottom line: Vertical Market Software cost is around the same cost of Multiview.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Vertical Vs. Multiview based on some of the most important and required Field Service features.

Vertical Market Software: We are still working to collect the list of features for Vertical Market Software.

Multiview: Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable, Billing & Invoicing, Budgeting & Forecasting, Fixed-Assets.

Target customer size

Vertical Market Software's typical customers include: SMBs, Multiview Financial Software is suited for most companies of varying sizes that also need a solution that facilitates in-depth management of their accounting branch.



Vertical Market Software

ITQlick rating
(4.3/5)

Vertical Market Software is cloud-based construction software that enables contractors to control operational processes and costs throughout the life cycle of a job, as well as managing maintenance scheduling a...

Categories: Inventory Management Accounting, Construction, Electrical Estimating, Mechanical and HVAC Estimating.

Multiview

ITQlick rating
(4.6/5)

starts at $150 per user/year

Multiview Financial Software is a cloud-based modular financial management system that incorporates accounts payable, accounts receivable, purchase order management, a general ledger, inventory management, busi...

Categories: Accounting & Finance, Billing & Invoicing, Budgeting & CPM, Core Accounting, Financial reporting.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Vertical Market Software: 0 Features

We are working to collect the list of features

Multiview: 19 Features

Accounts Payable
Accounts Receivable
Billing & Invoicing
Budgeting & Forecasting
Fixed-Assets
Fund-Accounting
Multi-Currency
Tax compliance
Time & Expense
Accounts Payable
Accounts Receivable
Billing & Invoicing
Purchase Orders
Data Analysis Tools
Time and Expense Tracking
Enterprise Resource Planning
CRM
Fixed Asset Management
Inventory Management
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Vertical
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
3/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
5
Compare
Multivie...
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
93/100
Pricing
3.8/10
License pricing
$150 per user/year
Functionality
53
Jobber
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$39 per user/month
Functionality
23
Review
HouseCal...
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
98/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$49 per user/month
Functionality
31
ServiceT...
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$398 per technician/month + $800 one-time setup cost
Functionality
22

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.