Compare Vorex PSA and Microsoft Dynamics GP - Aug 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Aug 02, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Vorex PSA or Microsoft Dynamics GP?

Microsoft Dynamics GP is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Vorex PSA, and Vorex PSA is rated higher (81/100) than Microsoft Dynamics GP (77/100). Microsoft Dynamics GP offers users more features (18) than Vorex PSA (6).

Looking for the right Project Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Vorex Vs. Microsoft

Vorex: Since day one, our mission has been to increase the productivity and profitability of our clients by engineering workflow management software that is not just comprehensive, but also easy to use Project Management: The core of Vorex PSA is a powerful, flexible project manager, letting you start managing projects in minutes instead of hours. Time ...

Microsoft: Microsoft Corporation is an American corporation that develops, manufactures, licenses and supports a wide range of products and services related to computing. The company was founded by Bill Gates and Paul Allen on April 4, 1975. Microsoft is the world's largest software maker measured by revenues.

Who is more expensive? Vorex PSA or Microsoft Dynamics GP?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Project Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Vorex PSA and Microsoft Dynamics GP.

Vorex PSA price starts at $35 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Vorex Project Management Suite is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Project Management software. Microsoft Dynamics GP price starts at $5,000 per license , When comparing Microsoft Dynamics GP to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Project Management software cost.

Bottom line: Microsoft Dynamics GP is more expensive than Vorex PSA.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Vorex PSA Vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP based on some of the most important and required Project Management features.

Vorex PSA: Budget & Expense Management, Document Management, Issue Tracking, Project Management, Scheduling, Task Management.

Microsoft Dynamics GP: Accounting Module, Business Intelligence Module, CRM Module, Human Resources Module, Inventory Management Module.

Target customer size

Vorex Project Management Suite is perfect for medium to large companies that juggle between several projects. Microsoft Dynamics GP is optimal for large enterprises as well as small businesses and freelancers.

Vorex PSA

ITQlick rating
(3.8/5)

starts at $35 per user/month

Vorex Project Management Suite software is a cloud-based business management solution that helps in the growth of a business. It offers a number of capabilities that include a help and ticketing tool that aids ...

Categories: ERP, Cloud ERP, Enterprise Resource Planning, Time and Attendance.

Microsoft Dynamics GP

ITQlick rating
(3.8/5)

starts at $5,000 per license

Microsoft Dynamics GP software is a cloud-hosted financial accounting system modeled for the needs of small to large enterprise businesses. Microsoft Dynamics GP is a product of Microsoft Company which acquired...

Categories: Recurring Billing, Billing & Invoicing, Core Accounting, Payroll Accounting, Project Accounting.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Vorex PSA: 6 Features

Budget & Expense Management
Document Management
Issue Tracking
Project Management
Scheduling
Task Management

Microsoft Dynamics GP: 18 Features

Accounting Module
Business Intelligence Module
CRM Module
Human Resources Module
Inventory Management Module
Manufacturing Module
Project Management Module
Supply Chain Management Module
ERP Integration
Inventory Optimization
Multi-Language
Multi-Location
Order Entry
Purchasing
Quality Control
Stock Inquiries
Supplier Management
Warehouse Management
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Vorex PS...
ITQlick rating
3.8/5
Score
81/100
Pricing
3/10
License pricing
$35 per user/month
Functionality
20
Compare
Microsof...
ITQlick rating
3.8/5
Score
77/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$5,000 per license
Functionality
31
Trello
ITQlick rating
4.2/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$5 per user/month
Functionality
16
Review
Basecamp
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
98/100
Pricing
4.2/10
License pricing
$11 per user/month
Functionality
15
monday.c...
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
98/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$10 per seat/month
Functionality
92

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.