Shlomi Lavi / Mar 23, 2022We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
WAPT Pro is more expensive to implement (TCO) than uniPoint, and uniPoint is rated higher (89/100) than WAPT Pro (50/100). uniPoint offers users more features (8) than WAPT Pro (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is uniPoint!
Looking for the right Quality Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
SoftLogica: SoftLogica focuses on the development, marketing and support of file and network management tools and utilities.
uniPoint Software Inc: uniPoint was founded in 1996 as an ERP implementation and consulting company, servicing small to mid-size manufactures throughout North America. uniPoint expanded into software development in 2002, offering its Quality Management Modules to new and existing customers. Today uniPoint software is used by over 1,000 companies in the US, Canada, Mex...
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Quality Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for WAPT Pro and uniPoint.
WAPT Pro price starts at $1,500 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 WAPT Pro is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Quality Management software. uniPoint price starts at $6,000 per license , When comparing uniPoint to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Quality Management software cost.
Bottom line: WAPT Pro cost is around the same cost of uniPoint.
We've compared WAPT Pro Vs. uniPoint based on some of the most important and required Quality Management features.
WAPT Pro: We are still working to collect the list of features for WAPT Pro.
uniPoint: Supplier Management, Document Management, Compliance , Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC), Quality management.
WAPT Pro's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, Customers of the software mainly include small and medium businesses hailing from a diverse range of industries.
starts at $1,500 per license
WAPT Pro is a growing cloud-based Quality Management software, it is designed to support small, medium and large size business. WAPT Pro received a rating of 3 from ITQlick team. The software cost is considered...
Compare Pricing| ITQlick Score: | 50/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
| Category: | Quality Management -> WAPT Pro review |
| Company: | SoftLogica |
| Pricing: | starts at $1,500 per license |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Cloud |
| Links: | WAPT Pro review, WAPT Pro pricing, WAPT Pro alternatives |
| ITQlick Score: | 89/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
| Category: | Quality Management -> uniPoint review |
| Company: | uniPoint Software Inc |
| Pricing: | starts at $6,000 per license |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop |
| Links: | uniPoint review, uniPoint pricing, uniPoint alternatives |
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.