Compare Wintac and ServiceTrade - Mar 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Mar 19, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Wintac or ServiceTrade?

Wintac is more expensive to implement (TCO) than ServiceTrade, and Wintac is rated higher (91/100) than ServiceTrade (90/100). Wintac offers users more features (16) than ServiceTrade (6).

Looking for the right Field Service solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Intac International Vs. ServiceTrade

Intac International: Founded in 1988 and headquartered in Burlington, Massachusetts, Intac International is the maker of Wintac - the award-winning, #1 best-selling, all-in-one business automation software for field service, installation, and construction companies. With over 25 years experience in providing the field service industry with the highest-quality softwa...

ServiceTrade: ServiceTrade provides smartphone, tablet, and web applications for service contractors. ServiceTrade improves field technician productivity and accountability while enhancing customer service and lowering administrative costs. To learn more or start a 30-day Free Trial, visit http://www.servicetrade.com/.

Who is more expensive? Wintac or ServiceTrade?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Field Service software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Wintac and ServiceTrade.

Wintac price starts at $1,495 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 Wintac is rated 8, which is higher than the average cost of Field Service software. ServiceTrade price starts at $79 per technician/month , When comparing ServiceTrade to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Field Service software cost.

Bottom line: Wintac is more expensive than ServiceTrade.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Wintac Vs. ServiceTrade based on some of the most important and required Field Service features.

Wintac: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Inventory Management, Billing/Invoicing, Contact Management, Contract Management, Customer Database, Customer Service, Customer Support Tracking, Dashboards.

ServiceTrade: Billing & Invoicing, Contract Management, Maintenance Management, Mobile Access, Preventive Maintenance.

Target customer size

Wintac is ideal for small to medium sized companies that provide various services, from plumbing and refrigeration to fuel oil delivery. The software is a useful solution for businesses of all sizes and a variety of types.

Wintac

ITQlick rating
(4.2/5)

starts at $1,495 per license

Wintac is a cloud based field service software designed for small to medium sized service companies that require a centralized management solution. It supports field service and allows you real time interaction...

Categories: Field Service, Field Service - Pest Control, Field Service Mobile Apps, FS Contact Management.

ServiceTrade

ITQlick rating
(4.7/5)

starts at $79 per technician/month

ServiceTrade provides customer service applications to service contractors. Our mobile and web applications enable office staff and field technicians to deliver an amazing customer experience.

Categories: Billing & Invoicing, Digital Signature, Customer Service, Field Service, Field Service - HVAC.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Wintac: 16 Features

Inventory Management
Billing/Invoicing
Contact Management
Contract Management
Customer Database
Customer Service
Customer Support Tracking
Dashboards
Document Management
Lead Management
Remote Access
Sales Reports
Workflow Rules & Management
Maintenance Management
Maintenance Scheduling
Mobile Access

ServiceTrade: 6 Features

Billing & Invoicing
Contract Management
Maintenance Management
Mobile Access
Preventive Maintenance
Field Service
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Wintac
ITQlick rating
4.2/5
Score
91/100
Pricing
8/10
License pricing
$1,495 per license
Functionality
27
Review
Compare
ServiceTrade
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
90/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$79 per technician/month
Functionality
21
Jobber
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$39 per user/month
Functionality
23
Review
HouseCal...
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
98/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$49 per user/month
Functionality
31
ServiceT...
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$398 per technician/month + $800 one-time setup cost
Functionality
22

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.