Compare Wishpond and Adestra - Oct 2022
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Wishpond or Adestra?
Adestra is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Wishpond, and Wishpond is rated higher (82/100) than Adestra (75/100).
Looking for the right Marketing Automation solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Wishpond Vs. Adestra
Wishpond: Wishpond is a privately held company. Since its inception in 2009 Wishpond has grown to help more than 100,000 marketers in North America and globally to effectively drive customer growth and engagement through online marketing channels. Wishpond is an all-in-one marketing suite that makes it easy to generate and nurture leads Wishpond makes it ...
Adestra: We have been empowering their clients to maximize marketing ROI through email-driven technology for over 10 years. Our flexible account structure, obsession with customer success, and award-winning service have gained the trust of global and growing brands alike. We were founded on the principle that marketing success takes more than technology...
Who is more expensive? Wishpond or Adestra?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Marketing Automation software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Wishpond and Adestra.
Wishpond price starts at $49 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Wishpond is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Marketing Automation software. Adestra accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Wishpond is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Marketing Automation software.
Bottom line: Adestra is more expensive than Wishpond.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Wishpond Vs. Adestra based on some of the most important and required Marketing Automation features.
Wishpond: We are still working to collect the list of features for Wishpond.
Adestra: We are still working to collect the list of features for Adestra.
Target customer size
Wishpond's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and Adestra's target customer size include: SMBs.
Compare specifications
Wishpond Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 82/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Marketing Automation -> Wishpond review |
Company: | Wishpond |
Pricing: | starts at $49 per month |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile |
Links: | Wishpond review, Wishpond pricing, Wishpond alternatives |
Adestra Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 75/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
Category: | Email Marketing -> Adestra review |
Company: | Adestra |
Typical customers: | SMBs |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile |
Links: | Adestra review, Adestra pricing, Adestra alternatives |
Compare features
Wishpond: 0 Features
Adestra: 0 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.