Compare Workable and Epicor HCM - Mar 2022
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Workable or Epicor HCM?
Epicor HCM is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Workable, and Workable is rated higher (96/100) than Epicor HCM (92/100). Workable offers users more features (17) than Epicor HCM (10). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Workable!
Looking for the right Applicant Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Workable Vs. Epicor Software Corporation
Workable: For years, we recruited for fast-growing companies. Went through thousands of resumes, down bottomless mail threads and countless job boards, each with its own posting structure. Roughed it with tedious applicant tracking software, the obligatory excel files on-the-side and the impossible coordination of interviews and feedback. At some point, i...
Epicor Software Corporation: Our commitment to providing world-class software and innovative technologies. The global infrastructure and experience to support new companies, regional companies and global affiliates. The determination to achieve superior customer service by a very high customer satisfaction. The strength, vision and profitability in order to act as a long-term ...
Who is more expensive? Workable or Epicor HCM?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Applicant Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Workable and Epicor HCM.
Workable price starts at $129 per job/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Workable is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Applicant Tracking software. Epicor HCM accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Workable is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Applicant Tracking software.
Bottom line: Epicor HCM is more expensive than Workable.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Workable Vs. Epicor HCM based on some of the most important and required Applicant Tracking features.
Workable: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Employee Self-Service, HR Management, Payroll, Performance Record, Recruiting, Software Customization, Applicant Tracking, Document Management.
Epicor HCM: Appraisal Performance, Benefits Administration, Employee Self-Service, HR Management, LMS.
Target customer size
Workable is a cross industry product focused on small and medium sized businesses. Epicor HCM is ideal for small to big companies that would like to improve the management of their human resources.
Epicor HCM
Epicor HCM is a cloud-based HCM solution which helps automate and HR processes in midsize and enterprise-level companies. The solution enables the user to manage, track and analyze all your employee data.
PriceDemoCompare specifications
Workable Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 96/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Applicant Tracking -> Workable review |
Company: | Workable |
Pricing: | starts at $129 per job/month |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | Workable review, Workable pricing, Workable alternatives |
Epicor HCM Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 92/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 10/10 - high cost |
Category: | Human Resources -> Epicor HCM review |
Company: | Epicor Software Corporation |
Typical customers: | Medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | Epicor HCM review, Epicor HCM pricing, Epicor HCM alternatives |
Compare features
Workable: 17 Features
Epicor HCM: 10 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.