Compare Workable and HouseCall Pro - Mar 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Mar 08, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Workable or HouseCall Pro?

Workable is more expensive to implement (TCO) than HouseCall Pro, and HouseCall Pro is rated higher (98/100) than Workable (96/100). Workable offers users more features (17) than HouseCall Pro (10).

Looking for the right Applicant Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Workable Vs. Codefied Inc.

Workable: For years, we recruited for fast-growing companies. Went through thousands of resumes, down bottomless mail threads and countless job boards, each with its own posting structure. Roughed it with tedious applicant tracking software, the obligatory excel files on-the-side and the impossible coordination of interviews and feedback. At some point, i...

Codefied Inc.: The Codefied Inc, creator of HouseCall team came together after working for many years on contextual software for smartphones at world-leading wireless company Qualcomm. As homeowners, we were just stumped by why it was such a hassle to maintain our homes. So we set out to change the $200B+ home services industry by rethinking how things should wor...

Who is more expensive? Workable or HouseCall Pro?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Applicant Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Workable and HouseCall Pro.

Workable price starts at $129 per job/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Workable is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Applicant Tracking software. HouseCall Pro price starts at $49 per user/month , When comparing HouseCall Pro to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Applicant Tracking software cost.

Bottom line: Workable cost is around the same cost of HouseCall Pro.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Workable Vs. HouseCall Pro based on some of the most important and required Applicant Tracking features.

Workable: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Employee Self-Service, HR Management, Payroll, Performance Record, Recruiting, Software Customization, Applicant Tracking, Document Management.

HouseCall Pro: Email alerts, Mobile Access, Data Analysis Tools, Billing & Invoicing, Contract Management.

Target customer size

Workable is a cross industry product focused on small and medium sized businesses. The software is a feasible option for businesses of all sizes as well as a large range of kinds.



Workable

ITQlick rating
(4.4/5)

starts at $129 per job/month

Workable is a recruitment management system. The software includes support for career pages, job posting, scheduling, recruiting and analytics. Workable was founded with the goal to provide a tool that help ...

Categories: Billing & Invoicing, CRM, Self-Service Portal, Human Resources.

HouseCall Pro

ITQlick rating
(4.7/5)

starts at $49 per user/month

HouseCall Pro is a cloud-based field management system which is designed for use in businesses of all sizes starting from small-sized businesses, medium-sized businesses, and large enterprises. The solution pro...

Categories: Billing & Invoicing, Digital Signature, Recurring invoicing, Construction, Field Service.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Workable: 17 Features

Employee Self-Service
HR Management
Payroll
Performance Record
Recruiting
Software Customization
Applicant Tracking
Document Management
Email Integration
Email Notifications
Mobile Access
Pre-Employment Testing
Recruiting Management
Recruiting Management
Reference Checking
Resume Database
Social Networking

HouseCall Pro: 10 Features

Email alerts
Mobile Access
Data Analysis Tools
Billing & Invoicing
Contract Management
Electrical
HVAC
Scheduling
Employee Scheduling
Field Service
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Workable
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
96/100
Pricing
2.8/10
License pricing
$129 per job/month
Functionality
31
Compare
HouseCal...
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
98/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$49 per user/month
Functionality
31
ADP Work...
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
98/100
Pricing
3.6/10
License pricing
$62 per month
Functionality
18
Collage ...
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$7 per user/month
Functionality
22
Bullhorn...
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2.2/10
License pricing
$99 per user/month
Functionality
18

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.