Compare Workable and Recruiterbox - Mar 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Workable or Recruiterbox?

Workable is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Recruiterbox, and Workable is rated higher (96/100) than Recruiterbox (94/100). Workable offers users more features (17) than Recruiterbox (9).

Looking for the right Applicant Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Workable Vs. Recruiterbox

Workable: For years, we recruited for fast-growing companies. Went through thousands of resumes, down bottomless mail threads and countless job boards, each with its own posting structure. Roughed it with tedious applicant tracking software, the obligatory excel files on-the-side and the impossible coordination of interviews and feedback. At some point, i...

Recruiterbox: Recruiterbox is a result of talking to numerous people who hire. It was built during a time when recruiting was slow, forcing us to find what people that are hiring really need. We saw that most people did not use recruiting software because it was too overwhelming or expensive. Those who did buy software complained that their employees did not ...

Who is more expensive? Workable or Recruiterbox?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Applicant Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Workable and Recruiterbox.

Workable price starts at $129 per job/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Workable is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Applicant Tracking software. Recruiterbox price starts at $20 per month , When comparing Recruiterbox to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Applicant Tracking software cost.

Bottom line: Workable cost is around the same cost of Recruiterbox.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Workable Vs. Recruiterbox based on some of the most important and required Applicant Tracking features.

Workable: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Employee Self-Service, HR Management, Payroll, Performance Record, Recruiting, Software Customization, Applicant Tracking, Document Management.

Recruiterbox: Multi Language, Workflow, HR Management, Recruiting, Applicant Tracking.

Target customer size

Workable is a cross industry product focused on small and medium sized businesses. The founders of Recruiterbox enjoy building intuitive products which are simple and affordable.