Compare yieldWerx and BEAS - Jun 2022
Compare Pricing
Shlomi Lavi / Jun 23, 2022We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - yieldWerx or BEAS?
BEAS is more expensive to implement (TCO) than yieldWerx, and BEAS is rated higher (85/100) than yieldWerx (83/100). BEAS offers users more features (6) than yieldWerx (2).
Looking for the right Manufacturing solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
yieldWerx Vs. Boyum Solutions
yieldWerx: Architected for flexible end-to-end yield management Adaptable to each customers unique needs Capable of addressing complex yield management issues
Boyum Solutions: Boyum IT Solutions is a global award-winning SAP Business One implementation, consultancy and development house with more than 5,000 customers worldwide. Our strong individual skill sets combined with our fast and efficient implementation methodology make us one of the strongest teams in the field.
Who is more expensive? yieldWerx or BEAS?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Manufacturing software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for yieldWerx and BEAS.
yieldWerx accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 yieldWerx is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Manufacturing software. BEAS accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 yieldWerx is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Manufacturing software.
Bottom line: yieldWerx cost is around the same cost of BEAS.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared yieldWerx Vs. BEAS based on some of the most important and required Manufacturing features.
yieldWerx: Manufacturing, Quality management.
BEAS: Accounting & Finance, Financial reporting, Data Analysis Tools, Manufacturing, MRP Software.
Target customer size
yieldWerx's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and BEAS's target customer size include: SMBs.
Compare specifications
yieldWerx Specifications
| ITQlick Score: | 83/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
| Category: | Manufacturing -> yieldWerx review |
| Company: | yieldWerx |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
| Links: | yieldWerx review, yieldWerx pricing, yieldWerx alternatives |
BEAS Specifications
| ITQlick Score: | 85/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
| Category: | Manufacturing -> BEAS review |
| Company: | Boyum Solutions |
| Typical customers: | SMBs |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
| Links: | BEAS review, BEAS pricing, BEAS alternatives |
Compare features
yieldWerx: 2 Features
BEAS: 6 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.