MG-Track - Top Competitors (Feb 2023)

Shlomi Lavi / updated: Feb 25, 2023

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

MG-Track vs. Alternatives in 2023

There are many radiology information system (RIS) software options available in the market, and comparing them can help you make an informed decision based on your specific needs. Here are some key differences and similarities between MG-Track Radiology Systems (RIS) software and five alternative options:

1. Carestream Vue RIS

• Features: Carestream Vue RIS provides a range of features such as scheduling, registration, image management, reporting, and billing.
• Prices: Carestream does not disclose pricing on their website and requires customers to contact them for a quote.
• Vendor size: Carestream is a large vendor with a global presence.
• Customer type: Carestream serves a variety of customers, including hospitals, clinics, imaging centers, and healthcare providers.
• Cost of implementation: Carestream Vue RIS requires a customized implementation process, and the cost may vary depending on the size and complexity of the organization.

2. Merge RIS

• Features: Merge RIS offers a range of features such as scheduling, patient registration, image management, reporting, and billing.
• Prices: Merge does not disclose pricing on their website and requires customers to contact them for a quote.
• Vendor size: Merge is a mid-sized vendor with a global presence.
• Customer type: Merge serves a variety of customers, including hospitals, imaging centers, and healthcare providers.
• Cost of implementation: Merge RIS requires a customized implementation process, and the cost may vary depending on the size and complexity of the organization.

3. Fujifilm Synapse RIS

• Features: Fujifilm Synapse RIS provides features such as appointment scheduling, patient registration, image management, reporting, and billing.
• Prices: Fujifilm does not disclose pricing on their website and requires customers to contact them for a quote.
• Vendor size: Fujifilm is a large vendor with a global presence.
• Customer type: Fujifilm serves a variety of customers, including hospitals, clinics, imaging centers, and healthcare providers.
• Cost of implementation: Fujifilm Synapse RIS requires a customized implementation process, and the cost may vary depending on the size and complexity of the organization.

4. Epic Radiant

• Features: Epic Radiant offers a range of features such as scheduling, patient registration, image management, reporting, and billing.
• Prices: Epic does not disclose pricing on their website and requires customers to contact them for a quote.
• Vendor size: Epic is a large vendor with a global presence.
• Customer type: Epic serves a variety of customers, including hospitals, clinics, imaging centers, and healthcare providers.
• Cost of implementation: Epic Radiant requires a customized implementation process, and the cost may vary depending on the size and complexity of the organization.

5. MedInformatix RIS

• Features: MedInformatix RIS provides features such as appointment scheduling, patient registration, image management, reporting, and billing.
• Prices: MedInformatix does not disclose pricing on their website and requires customers to contact them for a quote.
• Vendor size: MedInformatix is a mid-sized vendor with a global presence.
• Customer type: MedInformatix serves a variety of customers, including hospitals, clinics, imaging centers, and healthcare providers.
• Cost of implementation: MedInformatix RIS requires a customized implementation process, and the cost may vary depending on the size and complexity of the organization.

In terms of similarities, all of these RIS software options offer similar features such as scheduling, patient registration, image management, reporting, and billing. They also serve a variety of customers, including hospitals, clinics, imaging centers, and healthcare providers.

In terms of differences, pricing and vendor size can vary between these options. Some vendors may offer more customization options, while others may have a more standardized implementation process. Additionally, some vendors may focus on specific industries or market segments, while others may have a broader range of customers.

In terms of cost of implementation, it is difficult to compare as it can vary depending on the size and complexity of the organization, the customization required, and other factors such as training and support. It is important to consider not only the upfront cost of implementation but also the ongoing maintenance and support costs.

Overall, it is recommended to evaluate each RIS software option based on your specific needs and requirements. Consider factors such as features, pricing, vendor size, customer type, and cost of implementation to make an informed decision that aligns with your organization's goals and objectives. It may also be helpful to read reviews and talk to other organizations that have implemented the software to gain insights and learn from their experiences.

MG-Track's Free Alternative

ClearCanvas is a free and open-source RIS and PACS software that provides features for managing and archiving medical images, as well as scheduling and reporting for radiology workflows. ClearCanvas is user-friendly and customizable, and it supports DICOM and HL7 standards for interoperability.

MG-Track Best Alternative for Small Business

Clinicea is a cloud-based practice management software that provides features for managing patient records, appointments, billing, and prescriptions. Clinicea also offers a radiology module that allows users to manage imaging orders and results, generate reports, and integrate with imaging systems. Clinicea is user-friendly and customizable, and it offers affordable pricing options for small businesses.