Mule ESB - Top 13 Alternatives

ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
Score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100 score, based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing pricing Score is a 1 to 10 score, based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality
Review
Compare
Mule
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
Score
90/100
Pricing Pricing score ranges between 1 to 10 while 1 is low TCO and 10 is high TCO (TCO - total cost of ownership: cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
4/10
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
$80,000 per year
Functionality
6
Review
Best for SMBs
Zapier
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
Score
94/100
Pricing Pricing score ranges between 1 to 10 while 1 is low TCO and 10 is high TCO (TCO - total cost of ownership: cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
6/10
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
$19.99 per month
Functionality
5
Review
Best for Enterprise
CloverETL
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
Score
91/100
Pricing Pricing score ranges between 1 to 10 while 1 is low TCO and 10 is high TCO (TCO - total cost of ownership: cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
5.8/10
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
$4,000 per license
Functionality
3
Growing
IntraLinks
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
Score
88/100
Pricing Pricing score ranges between 1 to 10 while 1 is low TCO and 10 is high TCO (TCO - total cost of ownership: cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
3.8/10
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
$6 per user/month
Functionality
4
Free version
Skyvia
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
Score
73/100
Pricing Pricing score ranges between 1 to 10 while 1 is low TCO and 10 is high TCO (TCO - total cost of ownership: cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
6/10
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
$15 per month
Functionality
3
Review

Mule ESB top competitors and alternatives in 2021

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / updated: Jul 21, 2020

We publish unbiased reviews, our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more in our advertiser disclosure.

Mule ESB Review
ITQlick Score: 90/100
ITQlick Rating: (5/5)
Pricing: 4/10 - average cost
Category: Enterprise Integration -> Mule ESB -> Mule ESB alternatives
Ranking:Ranked 5 out of 110 Enterprise Integration systems
Company: Mulesoft
Pricing: starts at $80,000 per year
Typical customers: Small, medium and large size businesses
Platforms: Desktop, Cloud
Links: Mule ESB review, Mule ESB pricing

Mule ESB is a fantastic tool with many features, but it’s important to make sure you’re choosing the right Enterprise Integration software for your company and its unique needs. Mule ESB has some strong competitors and alternatives, and there’s a chance that one of them might be a better fit for your company.

Who are Mule ESB main alternatives?

Here are the top 4 alternatives to Mule ESB that are worth checking out: Zapier for SMBs, CloverETL Rapid Data Integration for large size business, IntraLinks Dealspace for growing companies, and Skyvia for startups and SMBs.

1. Zapier - Best for SMBs

Zapier is an alternative Enterprise Integration software, Zapier installed on-premises or used cloud based, Mule ESB cloud Zapier, with a pricing score of 6 is considered more expensive to implement than Mule ESB with a score of 4.

Zapier is rated 4.7 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (Zapier offers 5 main features).

Compare head to head: Zapier Vs Mule ESB

2. CloverETL Rapid Data Integration - Best for Large Business

CloverETL Rapid Data Integration is an alternative Enterprise Integration software, CloverETL Rapid Data Integration cloud, Mule ESB cloud CloverETL Rapid Data Integration, with a pricing score of 5.8 is considered more expensive to implement than Mule ESB with a score of 4.

CloverETL Rapid Data Integration is rated 4.2 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (CloverETL offers 3 main features).

Compare head to head: CloverETL Rapid Data Integration Vs Mule ESB

3. IntraLinks Dealspace - Best for Growing Companies

IntraLinks Dealspace is an alternative Enterprise Integration software, IntraLinks Dealspace cloud, Mule ESB cloud IntraLinks Dealspace, with a pricing score of 3.8 is considered less expensive to implement than Mule ESB with a score of 4.

IntraLinks Dealspace is rated 3 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (IntraLinks offers 4 main features).

Compare head to head: IntraLinks Dealspace Vs Mule ESB

4. Skyvia - Best for NO Budget or Start up Companies

Skyvia is an alternative Enterprise Integration software, Skyvia installed on-premises or used cloud based, Mule ESB cloud Skyvia, with a pricing score of 6 is considered more expensive to implement than Mule ESB with a score of 4.

Skyvia is rated 4.7 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (Skyvia offers 3 main features).

Compare head to head: Skyvia Vs Mule ESB

5. Piesync

Piesync is an alternative Enterprise Integration software, Piesync installed on-premises or used cloud based, Mule ESB cloud Piesync, with a pricing score of 5 is considered more expensive to implement than Mule ESB with a score of 4.

Piesync is rated 4.8 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (Piesync offers 4 main features).

Compare head to head: Piesync Vs Mule ESB

6. ShareVault Enterprise

ShareVault Enterprise is an alternative Enterprise Integration software, ShareVault Enterprise used on the cloud, Mule ESB cloud ShareVault Enterprise, with a pricing score of 5.2 is considered more expensive to implement than Mule ESB with a score of 4.

ShareVault Enterprise is rated 3.2 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (ShareVault offers 4 main features).

Compare head to head: ShareVault Enterprise Vs Mule ESB

7. Discovery Studio

Discovery Studio is an alternative Enterprise Integration software, Discovery Studio cloud, Mule ESB cloud Discovery Studio, with a pricing score of 6.8 is considered more expensive to implement than Mule ESB with a score of 4.

Discovery Studio is rated 3.9 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (Discovery offers 4 main features).

Compare head to head: Discovery Studio Vs Mule ESB

8. CloudWork

CloudWork is an alternative Enterprise Integration software, CloudWork used on the cloud, Mule ESB cloud CloudWork, with a pricing score of 3.6 is considered less expensive to implement than Mule ESB with a score of 4.

CloudWork is rated 4.6 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (CloudWork offers 5 main features).

Compare head to head: CloudWork Vs Mule ESB

9. Centerprise Data Integrator

Centerprise Data Integrator is an alternative Enterprise Integration software, Centerprise Data Integrator installed on-premises, Mule ESB cloud Centerprise Data Integrator, with a pricing score of 6.2 is considered more expensive to implement than Mule ESB with a score of 4.

Centerprise Data Integrator is rated 4.1 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (Centerprise offers 3 main features).

Compare head to head: Centerprise Data Integrator Vs Mule ESB

10. Azuqua

Azuqua is an alternative Enterprise Integration software, Azuqua used on the cloud, Mule ESB cloud Azuqua, with a pricing score of 4.6 is considered more expensive to implement than Mule ESB with a score of 4.

Azuqua is rated 4 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (Azuqua offers 3 main features).

Compare head to head: Azuqua Vs Mule ESB

11. APPSeCONNECT

APPSeCONNECT is an alternative Enterprise Integration software, APPSeCONNECT installed on-premises or used cloud based, Mule ESB cloud APPSeCONNECT, with a pricing score of 2.6 is considered less expensive to implement than Mule ESB with a score of 4.

APPSeCONNECT is rated 5 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (APPSeCONNECT offers 11 main features).

Compare head to head: APPSeCONNECT Vs Mule ESB

12. IFTTT

IFTTT is an alternative Enterprise Integration software, IFTTT installed on-premises, Mule ESB cloud IFTTT, with a pricing score of 6.4 is considered more expensive to implement than Mule ESB with a score of 4.

IFTTT is rated 3.5 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (IFTTT offers 3 main features).

Compare head to head: IFTTT Vs Mule ESB

13. dbsync integration

dbsync integration is an alternative Enterprise Integration software, dbsync integration installed on-premises, Mule ESB cloud dbsync integration, with a pricing score of 5.2 is considered more expensive to implement than Mule ESB with a score of 4.

dbsync integration is rated 4.6 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (dbsync offers 5 main features).

Compare head to head: dbsync integration Vs Mule ESB


Author
Shlomi Lavi - admin

Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin Facebook Twitter

Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.