QAngio XA Review - why 5 stars?

QAngio XA Review
ITQlick Score: 88/100
ITQlick Rating: (5/5)
Pricing: 4/10 - average cost
Category: Radiology Systems (RIS) -> QAngio
Ranking:Ranked 4 out of 27 Radiology Systems (RIS) systems
Company: Medis medical imaging systems
Typical customers: Small, medium and large size businesses
Platforms: Mobile, Cloud
Links: QAngio XA pricing, QAngio XA alternatives

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / updated: Jun 02, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn more by reading our advertiser disclosure.

What is QAngio and its features?

MEDIS, a leading developer and supplier of software applications for image-based diagnosis and quantitative assessment of cardiovascular disease, today announced that it acquired Advanced Medical Imaging Development S.r.l. (AMID), a developer and supplier specialized in cardiovascular mechanics and innovative image processing in ultrasound and other modalities.


What is QAngio XA rating?

The rating of QAngio XA is 5 stars out of 5 and the total score is 88 out of 100. The rating score is based on our unbiased data-based algo. Learn more - rating methodology page.

Who uses QAngio XA?

The typical customers include the following business size: Small, medium and large size businesses.

Is it easy to use?

Yes, QAngio XA makes it fairly easy to use. This product is user friendly and intuitive.

Is QAngio XA cloud-based?

Yes, they offer cloud based hosting, which means IT resources are retrieved through web-based tools and applications and you don't need to buy servers and additional hardware equipment.

Can it be used on mobile?

Yes, you can access QAngio XA on your mobile/smart phone.

Is QAngio XA the best Radiology Systems (RIS) system?

QAngio XA is ranked 4 out of 27 software in their category (Radiology Systems (RIS) systems).

What are QAngio XA's pros? (3 Pros)

  • QAngio XA is very intuitive and easy to learn
  • The software enables the performance of a high volume of quantitative angiographic analyses with limited personnel
  • It is the vendor-independent post-processing solution for X-Ray angiography

What are QAngio XA's cons? (1 cons)

  • The software lacks a knowledge base

Who are their main alternatives?

QAngio XA competes with other radiology systems like ProtonPACS, NovaPACS, and Ambra Health. We will compare these radiology systems in some specific aspects below.
  • Functionality: QAngio XA offers vital radiology features like Image Analysis & Data Processing, Flexible Modular Structure, 3D QCA Analysis, Quantitative Flow Ratio Analysis, Automated Analysis of Straight & Ostial Vessels, Innovative Automatic Bifurcation Analysis, Automatic Calibration Methods, etc. Compared to its alternatives, QAngio XA and its close alternatives, except NovaPACS offer an Audit Trail. Ambra Health, alongside the mentioned alternatives except for QAngio XA, offers Comparison View, Diagnostic Tools, HL7 Support, Image Management, Mobile Access, Non-DICOM Imaging Support, Patient Portal, Referring Physician Portal, and Workflow Management. Both NovaPACS and ProtonPACS offer Customizable Worklists & Reporting Tools lacking in QAngio XA.
  • Customers/Industries: QAngio XA targets clinicians, technicians, and researchers and has customers like Womens Cardiovascular Health Initiative and Thoraxcentrum Twente, Enschede. Compared to its alternatives, ProtonPACS targets Orthopaedic Practices Radiology Practices, and small to medium-sized hospitals. NovaPACS targets imaging centers, clinics, and radiology departments in hospitals of any size, while Ambra Health targets large hospital systems, medical groups, imaging centers, and clinical research organizations. Ambra Health has customers like Envision Radiology, Parexel, Weill Cornell Medicine, Barrow Neurological Institute, etc.
  • Cost: The license cost information for QAngio XA and its alternatives is unavailable.
  • Cloud-based/On-premise: QAngio XA and all its alternatives are cloud-based. NovaPACS has an On-Premise version for Windows, while ProtonPACS has an On-Premise version for Windows and Linux.
  • Scalability: QAngio XA, NovaPACS, and Ambra Health can accommodate health organizations of all sizes. ProtonPACS can accommodate small to medium-sized hospitals.
  • Support: QAngio XA offers support channels like Email/Help Desk and Phone Support. Ambra Health and NovaPACS offer an Email/Help Desk, FAQs/Forum, Knowledge Base, Phone Support, 24/7 (Live Rep), and Chat. ProtonPACS offers Email/Help Desk and Phone Support.

What is the cost of QAngio XA?

What is the REAL total cost of implementation? on top of the total cost of licenses which is easy to calculate you need to add the cost of training, customization, data migration, and other "hidden cost". ITQlick pricing score is 4 out of 10 (10 is most expensive). Find here the REAL total cost breakdown for QAngio XA

What should you ask Medis medical imaging systems during a demo session? (65 questions)

Schedule a demo with QAngio XA and access 65 must ask questions for the vendor while watching QAngio XA in action.

Where QAngio XA is used?

QAngio XA will fit for health organizations looking for a radiography system and image quantification software that provides these accurate, validated results. Medis QAngio XA is a complete and customized quantification solution for coronary and peripheral angiograms and left and right ventricular angiograms.

List of categories

EDI
Image Fusion
Radiology Systems (RIS)

List of features

EDI

QAngio XA Vs. Alternatives

ITQlick rating
Score
Pricing
License pricing
Functionality
Review
Compare
QAngio
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
88/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
4
Review
Compare
PDQuest
ITQlick rating
3.6/5
Score
89/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
3
VIS
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
89/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
3
Review
ORS
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
88/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$1,360 per year
Functionality
3
Review
MG-Track
ITQlick rating
3.6/5
Score
88/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
3

Author

Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.