Shlomi Lavi /
Apr 12, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Webroster.net or Full Slate?
Full Slate is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Webroster.net, and Full Slate is rated higher (89/100) than Webroster.net (77/100). Full Slate offers users more features (3) than Webroster.net (0).
Looking for the right Booking and scheduling solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Webroster Ltd Vs. Full Slate
Webroster Ltd: Webroster Ltd is a privately owned, founder led company with a forward thinking, dynamic and progressive approach. With an agile company structure we are able to respond quickly to ever changing customer needs. Our market leading software solutions are designed to enhance business through the use of the internet and as such, introduce new ways of ...
Full Slate: Full Slate offers comprehensive software-as-a-service (SaaS) scheduling. SMB’s do not need to download or maintain software and can access it from any Internet-connected computer, tablet, iPhone or Android phone. Businesses pay a monthly subscription starting at $29.95 for a single practitioner for unlimited clients and unlimited appointments. Key ...
Who is more expensive? Webroster.net or Full Slate?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Booking and scheduling software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Webroster.net and Full Slate.
Webroster.net price starts at $93 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Webroster.net is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Booking and scheduling software. Full Slate price starts at $29.95 per user/month , When comparing Full Slate to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Booking and scheduling software cost.
Bottom line: Full Slate is more expensive than Webroster.net.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Webroster.net Vs. Full Slate based on some of the most important and required Booking and scheduling features.
Webroster.net: We are still working to collect the list of features for Webroster.net.
Full Slate: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Target customer size
Webroster.net's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and Full Slate's target customer size include: Medium and large size businesses.