Compare Acromobile and ETran - Apr 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Acromobile or ETran?

Acromobile is more expensive to implement (TCO) than ETran, and ETran is rated higher (73/100) than Acromobile (50/100). ETran offers users more features (3) than Acromobile (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is ETran!

Looking for the right Payment Processing solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Acromobile Vs. Financial Transmission Network, Inc.

Acromobile: Acromobile helps companies leverage mobile and social media channels to improve customer experience, deliver more value, and drive revenue. Acromobile Services Overview - develop mobile and social media strategies, create compelling apps, and execute highly targeted marketing campaigns.

Financial Transmission Network, Inc.: Financial Transmissions Network Inc. (FTNI) was formed out of the need for a single, user-friendly accounts receivable (A/R) application that would process all payment types, while integrating with existing back-office A/R systems. ETran powered by FTNI does all that and more.

Who is more expensive? Acromobile or ETran?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Payment Processing software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Acromobile and ETran.

Acromobile price starts at $150 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Acromobile is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Payment Processing software. ETran accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Acromobile is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Payment Processing software.

Bottom line: Acromobile is more expensive than ETran.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Acromobile Vs. ETran based on some of the most important and required Payment Processing features.

Acromobile: We are still working to collect the list of features for Acromobile.

ETran: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

Target customer size

Acromobile's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and ETran's target customer size include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business, Private use.