Shlomi Lavi /
Nov 15, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Ariba Contract or Fixed Asset Assistant?
Fixed Asset Assistant is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Ariba Contract, and Ariba Contract is rated higher (77/100) than Fixed Asset Assistant (62/100). Ariba Contract offers users more features (13) than Fixed Asset Assistant (3). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Ariba Contract!
Looking for the right Procurement solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Ariba Vs. Cetaris
Ariba: Ariba is an SAP company. Every day, we help our customers find opportunities to cut costs, reduce risk, and grow revenue through better collaboration with trading partners. We enable that collaboration through the Ariba Network — a cloud-based community where you’ll find buying, selling, and managing cash to be as easy as using Amazon, eBay, and Pa...
Cetaris : etaris is a world class provider of Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) and Fleet Maintenance Solutions helping some of the world’s largest organizations to manage millions of assets in over fifty countries.With offices in Toronto, Ontario and Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina, our fleet maintenance software and fixed asset life cycle management s...
Who is more expensive? Ariba Contract or Fixed Asset Assistant?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Procurement software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Ariba Contract and Fixed Asset Assistant.
Ariba Contract price starts at $8,000 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 Ariba Contract Management is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Procurement software. Fixed Asset Assistant accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Ariba Contract Management is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Procurement software.
Bottom line: Fixed Asset Assistant is more expensive than Ariba Contract.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Ariba Contract Vs. Fixed Asset Assistant based on some of the most important and required Procurement features.
Ariba Contract: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Audit Trail, Clause Libraries, Configurable Reports, Contract Compliance, Contract Modifications, Contract Renewals, Customizable Alerts, Dashboard.
Fixed Asset Assistant: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Target customer size
Ariba Contract's typical customers include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business, The software is a viable solution for businesses of all sizes regardless of their types.