Compare AtlasMD and Aurora - May 2023

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - AtlasMD or Aurora?

Aurora is more expensive to implement (TCO) than AtlasMD, and Aurora is rated with the same score (82/100) as AtlasMD (82/100). AtlasMD offers users more features (3) than Aurora (2). There is a clear winner in this case and it is AtlasMD!

Looking for the right Electronic Medical Records solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Atlas MD Vs. Boston Advanced Analytics

Atlas MD: Atlas MD is a direct primary care software and practice management platform. It enables healthcare providers to offer personalized, affordable, and accessible healthcare services to their patients. With features like patient communication, appointment scheduling, billing, and telemedicine capabilities, Atlas MD empowers small healthcare practices t...

Boston Advanced Analytics: Boston Advanced Analytics (Previously Coping Systems, Inc.) specializes in healthcare IT solutions - dedicated to helping both researchers and providers reduce cost while continuously improving quality of care, patient safety and treatment outcomes.

Who is more expensive? AtlasMD EMR or Aurora Clinical?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Electronic Medical Records software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for AtlasMD EMR and Aurora Clinical.

AtlasMD EMR price starts at $300 per provider/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 AtlasMD EMR is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Electronic Medical Records software. Aurora Clinical accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 AtlasMD EMR is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Electronic Medical Records software.

Bottom line: AtlasMD EMR cost is around the same cost of Aurora Clinical.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared AtlasMD Vs. Aurora based on some of the most important and required Electronic Medical Records features.

AtlasMD EMR: Billing & Invoicing, Medical, Scheduling.

Aurora Clinical: BSA Compliance, FCRA Compliance.

Target customer size

AtlasMD EMR primarily serves direct primary care (DPC) practices, which are healthcare providers that operate on a membership-based model and provide comprehensive primary care services to their patients. and Aurora Clinical's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.