Compare BEAS and CyberPlan - May 2022
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - BEAS or CyberPlan?
CyberPlan is more expensive to implement (TCO) than BEAS, and BEAS is rated higher (85/100) than CyberPlan (69/100). BEAS offers users more features (6) than CyberPlan (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is BEAS!
Looking for the right Manufacturing solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Boyum Solutions Vs. Cybertec
Boyum Solutions: Boyum IT Solutions is a global award-winning SAP Business One implementation, consultancy and development house with more than 5,000 customers worldwide. Our strong individual skill sets combined with our fast and efficient implementation methodology make us one of the strongest teams in the field.
Cybertec: Full Supply Chain visibility. Control of every production process. Simplify complex decisions. All this with Cybertec’s consulting and APS software (Advanced Planning & Scheduling).
Who is more expensive? BEAS or CyberPlan?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Manufacturing software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for BEAS and CyberPlan.
BEAS accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 BEAS is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Manufacturing software. CyberPlan price starts at $1,500 per feature/month , When comparing CyberPlan to its competitors, the software is rated 10 - much higher than the average Manufacturing software cost.
Bottom line: CyberPlan is more expensive than BEAS.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared BEAS Vs. CyberPlan based on some of the most important and required Manufacturing features.
BEAS: Accounting & Finance, Financial reporting, Data Analysis Tools, Manufacturing, MRP Software, Quality management.
CyberPlan: We are still working to collect the list of features for CyberPlan.
Target customer size
BEAS's typical customers include: SMBs, and CyberPlan's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.
Compare specifications
BEAS Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 85/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Manufacturing -> BEAS review |
Company: | Boyum Solutions |
Typical customers: | SMBs |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | BEAS review, BEAS pricing, BEAS alternatives |
CyberPlan Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 69/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 10/10 - high cost |
Category: | Manufacturing -> CyberPlan review |
Company: | Cybertec |
Pricing: | starts at $1,500 per feature/month |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Cloud |
Links: | CyberPlan review, CyberPlan pricing, CyberPlan alternatives |
Compare features
BEAS: 6 Features
CyberPlan: 0 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.