Shlomi Lavi /
Jan 03, 2023
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Infor Birst or isoTracker QMS?
Infor Birst is more expensive to implement (TCO) than isoTracker QMS, and Infor Birst is rated higher (92/100) than isoTracker QMS (80/100). Infor Birst offers users more features (25) than isoTracker QMS (6).
Looking for the right Business Intelligence solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Birst Vs. Lennox Hill Ltd
Birst: Birst is among the fastest growing business-to-business software providers. Selling directly to businesses as well as other software vendors who seek to embed analytics into their applications, more than 1,000 organizations currently rely upon Birst for their business analytics needs.
Lennox Hill Ltd: Lennox Hill Ltd maintains tight control over policies in a dynamic and intense clinical environment... becomes simple when documents are managed by reliable, very easy-to-use and well supported software, such as isoTracker."
Who is more expensive? Infor Birst or isoTracker QMS?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Business Intelligence software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Infor Birst and isoTracker QMS.
Infor Birst price starts at $30,000 per 20 users/year , On a scale between 1 to 10 Birst is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Business Intelligence software. isoTracker QMS price starts at $460.30 per user/year , When comparing isoTracker QMS to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Business Intelligence software cost.
Bottom line: Infor Birst is more expensive than isoTracker QMS.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Infor Birst Vs. isoTracker QMS based on some of the most important and required Business Intelligence features.
Infor Birst: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Ad-Hoc Analysis, Ad-Hoc Reporting, Automatic Scheduled Reporting, Customizable Dashboard, Customizable Features, Dashboarding, Graphic Benchmark, Performance Measurements.
isoTracker QMS: Document Management, Compliance , Internal Audit Management, Training Record Management, Quality management.
Target customer size
Birst is a web-based service that can be useful to customers in all types of organizations and industries. Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes with backgrounds in a variety of
industries.