Shlomi Lavi /
May 15, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - BNA Fixed Assets or TurboCASH?
BNA Fixed Assets is more expensive to implement (TCO) than TurboCASH, and TurboCASH is rated higher (91/100) than BNA Fixed Assets (85/100). TurboCASH offers users more features (2) than BNA Fixed Assets (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is TurboCASH!
Looking for the right Accounting & Finance solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Bloomberg BNA Vs. TurboCASH
Bloomberg BNA: Bloomberg BNA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Bloomberg, is a leading source of legal, regulatory, and business information for professionals. Its network of more than 2,500 reporters, correspondents, and leading practitioners delivers expert analysis, news, practice tools, and guidance — the information that matters most to professionals. Bloomberg ...
TurboCASH: TurboCASH Accounting is a community developed, top drawer, SME accounting package that will make your business competitive. Here is a world class software package that is going to improve your profitability. Best of all it is free. There are no catches here. We are not looking to become your "accounting department". It is our pleasure to watch you ...
Who is more expensive? BNA Fixed Assets or TurboCASH Open Source Accounting?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Accounting & Finance software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for BNA Fixed Assets and TurboCASH Open Source Accounting.
BNA Fixed Assets price starts at $1,760 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 BNA Fixed Assets Software is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Accounting & Finance software. TurboCASH Open Source Accounting price starts at $60 per year , When comparing TurboCASH Open Source Accounting to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Accounting & Finance software cost.
Bottom line: BNA Fixed Assets is more expensive than TurboCASH Open Source Accounting.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared BNA Fixed Assets Vs. TurboCASH based on some of the most important and required Accounting & Finance features.
BNA Fixed Assets: We are still working to collect the list of features for BNA Fixed Assets.
TurboCASH Open Source Accounting: Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable.
Target customer size
BNA Fixed Assets's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and TurboCASH Open Source Accounting's target customer size include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business.