Compare Cardiology and ESO - Jun 2023

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Cardiology or ESO?

ESO is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Cardiology, and ESO is rated with the same score (82/100) as Cardiology (82/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.

Looking for the right Electronic Health Records (EHR) solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Objective Medical Systems Vs. ESO

Objective Medical Systems: Objective Medical Systems is a pioneering healthcare technology company that develops cutting-edge solutions for medical data management. Their innovative software integrates seamlessly with existing electronic health records, streamlining clinical workflows and improving patient care. By providing real-time analytics and customizable reporting, Ob...

ESO: ESO is a trusted and innovative provider of software solutions for the healthcare industry, specializing in pre-hospital and hospital data management. Their cutting-edge technology enables seamless information exchange, streamlined workflows, and data-driven insights for better patient outcomes. ESO solutions are designed to improve operational eff...

Who is more expensive? Cardiology 360 or ESO EHR?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Electronic Health Records (EHR) software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Cardiology 360 and ESO EHR.

Cardiology 360 accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Cardiology 360 is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Electronic Health Records (EHR) software. ESO EHR accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Cardiology 360 is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Electronic Health Records (EHR) software.

Bottom line: Cardiology 360 cost is around the same cost of ESO EHR.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Cardiology Vs. ESO based on some of the most important and required Electronic Health Records (EHR) features.

Cardiology 360: Billing & Invoicing, Scheduling, Medical.

ESO EHR: Billing & Invoicing, Quality management, Compliance .

Target customer size

Cardiology 360's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses,

ESO EHR serves a wide range of customers in the healthcare industry, specifically focusing on emergency medical services (EMS) and fire departments.