Shlomi Lavi /
Mar 19, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - CloverETL Data Integration or Aepona?
CloverETL Data Integration is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Aepona, and CloverETL Data Integration is rated higher (91/100) than Aepona (59/100).
Looking for the right Enterprise Integration solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Javlin Vs. Accelerite
Javlin: Javlin is the developer of the CloverETL rapid data integration platform and a key provider of solutions and services for mass data processing. Our customer base reaches across all industries. If there’s data, we’re there too – in sectors like finance, logistics, and healthcare.
CloverETL is a rapid, end-to-end data integration solution. Busine...
Accelerite: Accelerite’s software suite of cloud, IoT solutions and advanced endpoint management make it easy for enterprises to simplify and secure today’s complex, ever-evolving infrastructure. Fortune 500s, SMEs, operators, service providers and VARs around the world rely on Accelerite products to secure connected enterprises from a single pane view, quickl...
Who is more expensive? CloverETL Data Integration or Aepona?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Enterprise Integration software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for CloverETL Data Integration and Aepona.
CloverETL Data Integration price starts at $4,000 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 CloverETL Rapid Data Integration is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Enterprise Integration software. Aepona accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 CloverETL Rapid Data Integration is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Enterprise Integration software.
Bottom line: CloverETL Data Integration is more expensive than Aepona.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared CloverETL Data Integration Vs. Aepona based on some of the most important and required Enterprise Integration features.
CloverETL Data Integration: We are still working to collect the list of features for CloverETL Data Integration.
Aepona: We are still working to collect the list of features for Aepona.
Target customer size
The software is an extensive solution that can be used for the needs of any business size
and type. and Aepona's target customer size include: Medium and large size businesses.