Compare codeBeamer and Visual COBOL - Aug 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Aug 01, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - codeBeamer or Visual COBOL?

codeBeamer is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Visual COBOL, and codeBeamer is rated higher (81/100) than Visual COBOL (73/100). codeBeamer offers users more features (6) than Visual COBOL (3).

Looking for the right Application Lifecycle Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Intland Software Vs. MicroFocus

Intland Software: Intland Software is the leading provider of Requirements Management and Application Lifecycle Management solutions that boost the productivity of software development and business projects. Intland Software was founded in 1999 by industry veterans with a track record of delivering successful teamwork tools for the software engineering market. By s...

MicroFocus: Micro Focus International plc (Micro Focus®; LSE: MCRO.L) provides innovative software that allows companies to develop, test, deploy, assess and modernize business-critical enterprise applications. Micro Focus’ software enables customers’ business applications to respond rapidly to market changes and embrace modern architectures with reduced cost ...

Who is more expensive? codeBeamer or Visual COBOL?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Application Lifecycle Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for codeBeamer and Visual COBOL.

codeBeamer price starts at $1,500 per user/year , On a scale between 1 to 10 codeBeamer is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Application Lifecycle Management software. Visual COBOL accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 codeBeamer is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Application Lifecycle Management software.

Bottom line: codeBeamer is more expensive than Visual COBOL.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared codeBeamer Vs. Visual COBOL based on some of the most important and required Application Lifecycle Management features.

codeBeamer: Collaboration, Document Management, Issue Tracking, Project Management, Resource Management, Scheduling.

Visual COBOL: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

Target customer size

The software is a viable solution for businesses of all sizes without any restriction on industrial affiliation. and Visual COBOL's target customer size include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business.

codeBeamer

ITQlick rating
(3.3/5)

starts at $1,500 per user/year

codeBeamer is a project and application management solution for businesses of all sizes. Its capabilities include task management, document management, agile project management, and others. The software was des...

Categories: Project Management.

Visual COBOL

ITQlick rating
(4.1/5)

Visual COBOL is a growing cloud-based ALM: Application Life-cycle Management software, it is designed to support small, medium and large size business. Visual COBOL received a rating of 4.1 from ITQlick team. T...

Categories: Application Lifecycle Management.

Compare specifications

Compare features

codeBeamer: 6 Features

Collaboration
Document Management
Issue Tracking
Project Management
Resource Management
Scheduling

Visual COBOL: 3 Features

Data Import/Export
Basic Reports
Online Customer Support
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
codeBeamer
ITQlick rating
3.3/5
Score
81/100
Pricing
5/10
License pricing
$1,500 per user/year
Functionality
7
Compare
Visual C...
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
73/100
Pricing
3.4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
4
RunMyProcess
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
83/100
Pricing
3.8/10
License pricing
$40 per user/year
Functionality
3
HPE ALM
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
83/100
Pricing
5/10
License pricing
$13,500 per license
Functionality
3
OneOps S...
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
83/100
Pricing
3/10
License pricing
Has a free version
Functionality
15

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.