Shlomi Lavi /
Aug 01, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - codeBeamer or Visual COBOL?
codeBeamer is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Visual COBOL, and codeBeamer is rated higher (81/100) than Visual COBOL (73/100). codeBeamer offers users more features (6) than Visual COBOL (3).
Looking for the right Application Lifecycle Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Intland Software Vs. MicroFocus
Intland Software: Intland Software is the leading provider of Requirements Management and Application Lifecycle Management solutions that boost the productivity of software development and business projects.
Intland Software was founded in 1999 by industry veterans with a track record of delivering successful teamwork tools for the software engineering market. By s...
MicroFocus: Micro Focus International plc (Micro Focus®; LSE: MCRO.L) provides innovative software that allows companies to develop, test, deploy, assess and modernize business-critical enterprise applications. Micro Focus’ software enables customers’ business applications to respond rapidly to market changes and embrace modern architectures with reduced cost ...
Who is more expensive? codeBeamer or Visual COBOL?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Application Lifecycle Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for codeBeamer and Visual COBOL.
codeBeamer price starts at $1,500 per user/year , On a scale between 1 to 10 codeBeamer is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Application Lifecycle Management software. Visual COBOL accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 codeBeamer is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Application Lifecycle Management software.
Bottom line: codeBeamer is more expensive than Visual COBOL.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared codeBeamer Vs. Visual COBOL based on some of the most important and required Application Lifecycle Management features.
codeBeamer: Collaboration, Document Management, Issue Tracking, Project Management, Resource Management, Scheduling.
Visual COBOL: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Target customer size
The software is a viable solution for businesses of all sizes without any restriction on industrial affiliation. and Visual COBOL's target customer size include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business.