Collections CRM by BrightOffice is a cloud-based customer relationship management (CRM) software that specializes in debt collection management. It is designed to help collections agencies manage the life cycle...
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
ORCA is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Collections, and Collections is rated higher (82/100) than ORCA (62/100). Collections offers users more features (1) than ORCA (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Collections!
Looking for the right Debt collection solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
BrightOffice: Our cloud CRM software makes everyday challenges simple. With routine processes automated and everything in one place, you can focus on making your business brighter.
Geothentic Inc.: ...
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Debt collection software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Collections CRM and ORCA.
Collections CRM accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Collections CRM is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Debt collection software. ORCA price starts at $499 per license , When comparing ORCA to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Debt collection software cost.
Bottom line: ORCA is more expensive than Collections CRM.
We've compared Collections Vs. ORCA based on some of the most important and required Debt collection features.
Collections CRM: CRM.
ORCA: We are still working to collect the list of features for ORCA.
Typical customers of Collections CRM are collections agencies looking to streamline their operations and improve their turnaround times. and ORCA's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.
Collections CRM by BrightOffice is a cloud-based customer relationship management (CRM) software that specializes in debt collection management. It is designed to help collections agencies manage the life cycle...
Compare Pricingstarts at $499 per license
ORCA is a growing cloud-based Fleet management software, it is designed to support small, medium and large size fleet. ORCA received a rating of 4.7 from ITQlick team. The software cost is considered average (...
Compare PricingITQlick Score: | 82/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
Category: | Debt collection -> Collections CRM review |
Company: | BrightOffice |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | Collections CRM review, Collections CRM pricing, Collections CRM alternatives |
ITQlick Score: | 62/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
Category: | Debt collection -> ORCA review |
Company: | Geothentic Inc. |
Pricing: | starts at $499 per license |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop |
Links: | ORCA review, ORCA pricing, ORCA alternatives |
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.