Compare ContractExpress for SharePoint and Puridiom eProcurement Suite - Jul 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - ContractExpress for SharePoint or Puridiom eProcurement Suite?

Puridiom eProcurement Suite is more expensive to implement (TCO) than ContractExpress for SharePoint, and ContractExpress for SharePoint is rated higher (91/100) than Puridiom eProcurement Suite (82/100). Puridiom eProcurement Suite offers users more features (13) than ContractExpress for SharePoint (8).

Looking for the right Contract Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Business Integrity Vs. Technical Services Associates, Inc

Business Integrity: Business Integrity is the leader in contract creation and document assembly for the Microsoft SharePoint® platform. Our ContractExpress for SharePoint solution integrates our contract creation and document assembly engine into the Microsoft SharePoint platform. The powerful combination of ContractExpress document assembly together with Microsoft Sh...

Technical Services Associates, Inc: In 1983, Technical Services Associates Inc. (TSA), a small software development company specializing in procurement, set the stage by changing how procurement processes could be made more efficient by introducing automation of core procurement functions on a personal computer. Even though TSA was small in size, our innovative ideas, creativity, and...

Who is more expensive? ContractExpress for SharePoint or Puridiom eProcurement Suite?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Contract Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for ContractExpress for SharePoint and Puridiom eProcurement Suite.

ContractExpress for SharePoint accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 ContractExpress for SharePoint is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Contract Management software. Puridiom eProcurement Suite accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 ContractExpress for SharePoint is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Contract Management software.

Bottom line: Puridiom eProcurement Suite is more expensive than ContractExpress for SharePoint.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared ContractExpress for SharePoint Vs. Puridiom eProcurement Suite based on some of the most important and required Contract Management features.

ContractExpress for SharePoint: Clause Libraries, Compare Redlined Versions, Configurable Reports, Customizable Alerts, Document Repository, Group Level Access, Microsoft Word Integration, Templates.

Puridiom eProcurement Suite: Advanced Shipment Notification, Client Collaboration, Inventory Management, Sourcing & Procurement, Supplier Management.

Target customer size

ContractExpress for SharePoint's typical customers include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Any organization looking for a better procurement solution and want to start competing with other organizations without losing control over extra costs should use Puridiom.