Compare DaXtra and Bullhorn - Oct 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - DaXtra or Bullhorn?

DaXtra is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Bullhorn, and DaXtra is rated higher (92/100) than Bullhorn (75/100). Bullhorn offers users more features (5) than DaXtra (0).

Looking for the right Applicant Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

DaXtra Technologies Vs. Talent Rover

DaXtra Technologies: With strategic global offices in UK, US and Asia Pacific, DaXtra Technologies is a World-leading specialist in high-accuracy, multilingual Resume parsing, multi-source semantic Resume search, candidate-to-job matching and analytics technology. For over a decade we have been at the forefront of Intelligent Process Automation technology, providin...

Talent Rover: Talent Rover makes staffing and recruitment software the way it should be: simple, mobile, devoted to increasing efficiency and profitability across the entire workflow. The software combines sales (CRM), recruitment (ATS), human resources (HRIS) and back office in one cloud-based solution. Talent Rover also gives firms a competitive edge with real...

Who is more expensive? DaXtra or Talent Rover?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Applicant Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for DaXtra and Talent Rover.

DaXtra accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 DaXtra is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Applicant Tracking software. Talent Rover accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 DaXtra is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Applicant Tracking software.

Bottom line: DaXtra is more expensive than Talent Rover.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared DaXtra Vs. Bullhorn based on some of the most important and required Applicant Tracking features.

DaXtra: We are still working to collect the list of features for DaXtra.

Talent Rover: Workflow, Recruiting Management, Applicant Tracking, Customer Self Service Portal, Workflow Rules & Management.

Target customer size

The software is a viable solution for small and medium sized businesses as well as large enterprises. Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and a variety of types.