Shlomi Lavi / May 16, 2022We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
e-Builder Enterprise is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Parsley, and e-Builder Enterprise is rated higher (95/100) than Parsley (67/100). e-Builder Enterprise offers users more features (5) than Parsley (0).
Looking for the right Construction solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
e-Builder: e-Builder exists to enable repeat builders to improve construction project execution making construction faster, less expensive and more reliable, thus freeing up time and energy for society’s higher priorities. - See more at: http://www.e-builder.net/who-we-are/mission#sthash.mRNsDhWp.dpuf
Parsley Software: Parsley automatically converts between units of measure, between metric and English, between volume and weight, between your recipe measurements and the packaging your suppliers provide.
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Construction software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for e-Builder Enterprise and Parsley.
e-Builder Enterprise price starts at $20,000 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 e-Builder Enterprise is rated 8, which is higher than the average cost of Construction software. Parsley price starts at $79 per month , When comparing Parsley to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Construction software cost.
Bottom line: e-Builder Enterprise is more expensive than Parsley.
We've compared e-Builder Enterprise Vs. Parsley based on some of the most important and required Construction features.
e-Builder Enterprise: Accounting Management, Change Orders, Contract Management, RFIs/Submittals, Construction.
Parsley: We are still working to collect the list of features for Parsley.
The software is a suitable solution for small and medium businesses as well as large enterprises. and Parsley's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.
starts at $20,000 per license
e-Builder Enterprise is a construction management software solution for businesses of all sizes. Other than project management, it offers estimating, accounting, and integration services. The software wa...
Compare Pricing| ITQlick Score: | 95/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 8/10 - high cost |
| Category: | Construction -> e-Builder Enterprise review |
| Company: | e-Builder |
| Pricing: | starts at $20,000 per license |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
| Links: | e-Builder Enterprise review, e-Builder Enterprise pricing, e-Builder Enterprise alternatives |
| ITQlick Score: | 67/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
| Category: | Food Service Management -> Parsley review |
| Company: | Parsley Software |
| Pricing: | starts at $79 per month |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Cloud |
| Links: | Parsley review, Parsley pricing, Parsley alternatives |
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.