Compare e-Performance and Planable - Jul 2022
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - e-Performance or Planable?
e-Performance is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Planable, and e-Performance is rated higher (82/100) than Planable (78/100).
Looking for the right Social Media solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Frontier Software Vs. Planable
Frontier Software: Formed in Melbourne, Australia, in 1983, ‘chris’ – Comprehensive Human Resource Integrated Solution – is the result of more than three decades of investment in technologies and people with a sharp-focus on the provision of world-class, integrated HR and Payroll Management software solutions. Today, ‘chris’ is the cornerstone of HR and Payroll de...
Planable: Showcasing your work in Excels and Powerpoint is time-consuming and frustrating. Planable helps you preview Facebook, Twitter and Instagram posts exactly as they will appear when published.
Who is more expensive? e-Performance or Planable?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Social Media software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for e-Performance and Planable.
e-Performance price starts at $75,000 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 e-Performance is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Social Media software. Planable price starts at $9 per license , When comparing Planable to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Social Media software cost.
Bottom line: e-Performance cost is around the same cost of Planable.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared e-Performance Vs. Planable based on some of the most important and required Social Media features.
e-Performance: We are still working to collect the list of features for e-Performance.
Planable: We are still working to collect the list of features for Planable.
Target customer size
e-Performance's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and Planable's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.
Compare specifications
e-Performance Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 82/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
Category: | Social Media -> e-Performance review |
Company: | Frontier Software |
Pricing: | starts at $75,000 per license |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop |
Links: | e-Performance review, e-Performance pricing, e-Performance alternatives |
Planable Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 78/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
Category: | Social Media -> Planable review |
Company: | Planable |
Pricing: | starts at $9 per license |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Cloud |
Links: | Planable review, Planable pricing, Planable alternatives |
Compare features
e-Performance: 0 Features
Planable: 0 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.