Shlomi Lavi /
Mar 02, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - eBASS or PX3000?
PX3000 is more expensive to implement (TCO) than eBASS, and PX3000 is rated higher (90/100) than eBASS (62/100).
Looking for the right Benefits Administration solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
eBASS Vs. Penad Pension Services
eBASS: Web based Benefits Administration software. Paperless on line enrollment, data storage and export files to carriers. System centralizes data of all plans including rates, eligibility requirements and benefit availability for various employee classes. The system assures that all information is consistent and accurate. This puts HR in control with ea...
Penad Pension Services: Founded in 1983, Penad is Canada’s pension administration specialist and a leading supplier of pension and benefit software systems to employers, financial institutions, and governments around the world.
Penad takes care of the pension needs of plan sponsors across Canada and internationally with first-tier plan administration, consulting and ac...
Who is more expensive? eBASS or PX3000?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Benefits Administration software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for eBASS and PX3000.
eBASS price starts at $2 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 eBASS is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Benefits Administration software. PX3000 accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 eBASS is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Benefits Administration software.
Bottom line: PX3000 is more expensive than eBASS.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared eBASS Vs. PX3000 based on some of the most important and required Benefits Administration features.
eBASS: We are still working to collect the list of features for eBASS.
PX3000: We are still working to collect the list of features for PX3000.
Target customer size
eBASS's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and PX3000's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.