Compare eContext and Balanced Scorecard - Mar 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Mar 12, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - eContext or Balanced Scorecard?

Balanced Scorecard is more expensive to implement (TCO) than eContext, and Balanced Scorecard is rated higher (92/100) than eContext (77/100). Balanced Scorecard offers users more features (6) than eContext (3).

Looking for the right AI: Internal Data solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

eContext Vs. MGI Solution

eContext: Many tools that help you structure your data are restricted to a single vertical or industry. eContext general taxonomy provides the context required for topic classification and meaningful use in any industry.

MGI Solution: MGI Solutions is a management consulting and custom software development firm specializing in corporate performance management (CPM) solutions. The company was founded byTony Ciotti in 1994 to consult high net worth investors on private equity investments and to consult growth companies on capital formation, corporate financial strategies, merg...

Who is more expensive? eContext or Balanced Scorecard?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of AI: Internal Data software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for eContext and Balanced Scorecard.

eContext accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 eContext is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of AI: Internal Data software. Balanced Scorecard price starts at $125 per user/month , When comparing Balanced Scorecard to its competitors, the software is rated 8 - higher than the average AI: Internal Data software cost.

Bottom line: Balanced Scorecard is more expensive than eContext.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared eContext Vs. Balanced Scorecard based on some of the most important and required AI: Internal Data features.

eContext: Data Analysis Tools, Data analysis, Data integration.

Balanced Scorecard: Basic Reports, Dashboard, Data Import/Export, Online Customer Support, Data analysis.

Target customer size

eContext's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, Customers of the software include small and medium businesses from a variety of industries.



eContext

ITQlick rating
(3/5)

eContext does the work for you – we take unstructured text from any source and, in real time, structure, quantify, and make human-readable data at scale so that you can interpret the signals that matter to you....

Categories: AI: Internal Data, Big data, Data analysis, Data Analysis Tools.

Balanced Scorecard

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

starts at $125 per user/month

Balanced Scorecard is a cloud-based and on-premise strategic planning & management system tailored for small size and medium businesses. The software helps organizations to communicate their goals, align their ...

Categories: Budgeting & CPM, Business Intelligence, Dashboards & KPIs, Data analysis, Reporting.

Compare specifications

Compare features

eContext: 3 Features

Data Analysis Tools
Data analysis
Data integration

Balanced Scorecard: 6 Features

Basic Reports
Dashboard
Data Import/Export
Online Customer Support
Data analysis
Project Collaboration
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
eContext
ITQlick rating
3/5
Score
77/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
9
Compare
Balanced...
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
8/10
License pricing
$125 per user/month
Functionality
16
Deckard.ai
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
87/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$9.89 per user/month
Functionality
7
Cycorp
ITQlick rating
3/5
Score
87/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
4
Review
Kyndi
ITQlick rating
3/5
Score
81/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
7
Review

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.