Compare EngageSciences and Mass Relevance - Apr 2021

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Apr 07, 2021

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - EngageSciences or Mass Relevance?

EngageSciences is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Mass Relevance, and EngageSciences is rated higher (62/100) than Mass Relevance (54/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.

Looking for the right Social Media Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

EngageSciences Vs. Mass Relevance

EngageSciences: EngageSciences was set up to build a platform that would help social media managers deliver measurable return for enterprise marketing departments. The EngageSciences platform enables brands to create exceptional social marketing programs that maximize the lifetime value of fans. Unlocking social data to improve the targeting and segmentation for c...

Mass Relevance: The Mass Relevance culture is driven by our most valued asset: our people. Shortly after Mass Relevance was founded, the founding team discussed their core values. Two years later, with a full executive team, they took another pulse and things were still aligned. From that, we developed our core values, a list of fundamental principles that reflect...

Who is more expensive? EngageSciences or Mass Relevance?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Social Media Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for EngageSciences and Mass Relevance.

EngageSciences price starts at $1,500 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 EngageSciences is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Social Media Management software. Mass Relevance accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 EngageSciences is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Social Media Management software.

Bottom line: EngageSciences is more expensive than Mass Relevance.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared EngageSciences Vs. Mass Relevance based on some of the most important and required Social Media Management features.

EngageSciences: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

Mass Relevance: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

Target customer size

EngageSciences's typical customers include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business, and Mass Relevance's target customer size include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business.

EngageSciences

ITQlick rating
(3.2/5)

starts at $1,500 per user/month

EngageSciences is an award-winning cloud-based Social Media Management software, it is designed to support small, medium and large size business. EngageSciences received a rating of 3.2 from ITQlick team. The s...

Categories: Social Media, Curation, Promotions.

Mass Relevance

ITQlick rating
(3.6/5)

Mass Relevance is an award-winning cloud-based Social Media Management software, it is designed to support small, medium and large size business. Mass Relevance received a rating of 3.6 from ITQlick team. The s...

Categories: Social Media, Curation.

Compare specifications

Compare features

EngageSciences: 3 Features

Data Import/Export
Basic Reports
Online Customer Support

Mass Relevance: 3 Features

Data Import/Export
Basic Reports
Online Customer Support
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
EngageSciences
ITQlick rating
3.2/5
Score
62/100
Pricing
7/10
License pricing
$1,500 per user/month
Functionality
6
Compare
Mass Rel...
ITQlick rating
3.6/5
Score
54/100
Pricing
4.6/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
5
Radian6
ITQlick rating
3.4/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
4.8/10
License pricing
$1,000 per organization/month
Functionality
8
Televerde
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
6/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
3
Adobe So...
ITQlick rating
3.5/5
Score
91/100
Pricing
5.4/10
License pricing
$52.99 per month
Functionality
8

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.