Compare eyeson and TurboMeeting - May 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - eyeson or TurboMeeting?

TurboMeeting is more expensive to implement (TCO) than eyeson, and eyeson is rated higher (85/100) than TurboMeeting (76/100). eyeson offers users more features (6) than TurboMeeting (4). There is a clear winner in this case and it is eyeson!

Looking for the right Video Conferencing solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

eyeson Vs. R HUB Communications

eyeson: Besides video calls, you can also chat with your group. Keep each other up to date.

R HUB Communications: The desktop video has crossed the US twice, starting from Presenter (US West) to Server (US East) and returning from Server back to Viewer (US West).

Who is more expensive? eyeson or TurboMeeting?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Video Conferencing software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for eyeson and TurboMeeting.

eyeson price starts at $6.30 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 eyeson is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Video Conferencing software. TurboMeeting price starts at $795 per license , When comparing TurboMeeting to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Video Conferencing software cost.

Bottom line: TurboMeeting is more expensive than eyeson.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared eyeson Vs. TurboMeeting based on some of the most important and required Video Conferencing features.

eyeson: Chat, Data Analysis Tools, Collaboration Management, Document Management, Contact Management, Social Media.

TurboMeeting: Chat, Project Collaboration, Screen Blanking, Remote Support.

Target customer size

eyeson's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and TurboMeeting's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.