Compare FACTIVITY and BEAS - May 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / May 21, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - FACTIVITY or BEAS?

FACTIVITY is more expensive to implement (TCO) than BEAS, and BEAS is rated higher (85/100) than FACTIVITY (84/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.

Looking for the right Manufacturing Execution Software (MES) solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

FACTIVITY Vs. Boyum Solutions

FACTIVITY: FACTIVITY sells products that help manufacturers manage inventory better, shrink cycle time, and increase productivity. The company shipped its first totally integrated manufacturing execution system and positioned itself to take advantage of the growing manufacturing solutions marketplace. We look to the future to provide a variety of "state-o...

Boyum Solutions: Boyum IT Solutions is a global award-winning SAP Business One implementation, consultancy and development house with more than 5,000 customers worldwide. Our strong individual skill sets combined with our fast and efficient implementation methodology make us one of the strongest teams in the field.

Who is more expensive? FACTIVITY or BEAS?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Manufacturing Execution Software (MES) software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for FACTIVITY and BEAS.

FACTIVITY price starts at $50,000 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 FACTIVITY is rated 8, which is higher than the average cost of Manufacturing Execution Software (MES) software. BEAS accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 FACTIVITY is rated 8, which is higher than the average cost of Manufacturing Execution Software (MES) software.

Bottom line: FACTIVITY is more expensive than BEAS.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared FACTIVITY Vs. BEAS based on some of the most important and required Manufacturing Execution Software (MES) features.

FACTIVITY: Supply Chain Planning, Manufacturing, Document Management, Enterprise Resource Planning, Budgeting & CPM, Quality Control.

BEAS: Accounting & Finance, Financial reporting, Data Analysis Tools, Manufacturing, MRP Software.

Target customer size

FACTIVITY's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and BEAS's target customer size include: SMBs.

FACTIVITY

ITQlick rating
(2.8/5)

starts at $50,000 per license

FACTIVITY software is an on-premise and cloud-based MES (Manufacturing execution solution) that helps businesses to extract data as well as create real-time OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness) metrics to unde...

Categories: Inventory Management Accounting, Inventory Management, Lot Traceability, Manufacturing.

BEAS

ITQlick rating
(2.8/5)

BEAS is a manufacturing software designed as a global solution for manufacturing businesses. The software offers intelligible functionality and workflow, which manages processes from the point of planning to im...

Categories: Financial reporting, Data Analysis Tools, Manufacturing, Manufacturing Accounting, Manufacturing Execution Software (MES).

Compare specifications

Compare features

FACTIVITY: 6 Features

Supply Chain Planning
Manufacturing
Document Management
Enterprise Resource Planning
Budgeting & CPM
Quality Control

BEAS: 6 Features

Accounting & Finance
Financial reporting
Data Analysis Tools
Manufacturing
MRP Software
Quality management
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
FACTIVITY
ITQlick rating
2.8/5
Score
84/100
Pricing
9/10
License pricing
$50,000 per license
Functionality
23
Compare
BEAS
ITQlick rating
2.8/5
Score
85/100
Pricing
3.2/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
15
Review
JobBOSS
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
87/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$70 per seat/month
Functionality
24
Runcard
ITQlick rating
3.8/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
3.2/10
License pricing
$75,000 per user/year
Functionality
3
TrakSYS
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
80/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
Has a free version
Functionality
8

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.