Shlomi Lavi /
Aug 06, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - FAT FINGER or iTrak?
iTrak is more expensive to implement (TCO) than FAT FINGER, and iTrak is rated higher (92/100) than FAT FINGER (81/100).
Looking for the right EHS Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
SEE Forge Vs. NeoSystems
SEE Forge: SEE Forge is a fool proof, Fat Finger mobile application that allows oil field workers to do their job without
paper. SEE Forge integrates with existing legacy systems and providers real-time operational analytics to
management.
NeoSystems: NeoSystems has quickly become one of Canada’s leading provider of QHSE solutions. Headquartered in Calgary, Alberta, NeoSystems has served clients across North America and Europe with cost-effective and configurable business solutions that are quick to implement and intuitive to use. Our world-class Quality, Health, Safety & Environment (QHSE/EHS) ...
Who is more expensive? FAT FINGER or iTrak ?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of EHS Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for FAT FINGER and iTrak .
FAT FINGER price starts at $32 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 FAT FINGER is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of EHS Management software. iTrak accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 FAT FINGER is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of EHS Management software.
Bottom line: iTrak is more expensive than FAT FINGER.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared FAT FINGER Vs. iTrak based on some of the most important and required EHS Management features.
FAT FINGER: We are still working to collect the list of features for FAT FINGER.
iTrak : We are still working to collect the list of features for iTrak .
Target customer size
FAT FINGER's typical customers include: SMBs, and iTrak 's target customer size include: SMBs.