Compare GitHub and Bitbucket - Mar 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Mar 27, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - GitHub or Bitbucket?

Bitbucket is more expensive to implement (TCO) than GitHub, and GitHub is rated higher (91/100) than Bitbucket (88/100). GitHub offers users more features (6) than Bitbucket (3). There is a clear winner in this case and it is GitHub!

Looking for the right Application Development solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

GitHub Vs. Atlassian Pty Ltd

GitHub: GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together. With the collaborative features of GitHub.com, our desktop and mobile apps, and GitHub Enterprise, it has never been easier for individuals and teams to write better code, fas...

Atlassian Pty Ltd: Software is everywhere – on our computers, our watches, our refrigerators. And the teams building software together – developers, product managers, doc writers, bug-bashers – are our heroes. Our products help teams of all sizes track and share everything, work smarter, and create better software together.We are 400 geeks, beer drinkers, nerf herder...

Who is more expensive? GitHub or Bitbucket?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Application Development software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for GitHub and Bitbucket.

GitHub price starts at $4 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 GitHub is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Application Development software. Bitbucket price starts at $3 per user/month , When comparing Bitbucket to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Application Development software cost.

Bottom line: Bitbucket is more expensive than GitHub.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared GitHub Vs. Bitbucket based on some of the most important and required Application Development features.

GitHub: Basic Reports, Customizable Reporting, Data Import/Export, Online Customer Support, Data Analysis Tools, Access Permission Request.

Bitbucket: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

Target customer size

Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and a variety of types, including new startups. Bitbucket is a code hosting solution for Mercurial and Git that can help users to host their code online.



GitHub

ITQlick rating
(4.8/5)

starts at $4 per user/month

GitHub is a web based application development solution and repository for businesses of all sizes. Its capabilities include integrated issue tracking, milestones and labels, collaboration, and others. The softw...

Categories: Financial reporting, Data Analysis Tools, Team Collaboration, Remote Access.

Bitbucket

ITQlick rating
(4.6/5)

starts at $3 per user/month

Bitbucket is a code hosting solution for Mercurial and Git that can help users to host their code online. Users get to manage their confidence with built-in code comments, wikis, issue trackers and pull ...

Categories: Internet & Online.

Compare specifications

Compare features

GitHub: 6 Features

Basic Reports
Customizable Reporting
Data Import/Export
Online Customer Support
Data Analysis Tools
Access Permission Request

Bitbucket: 3 Features

Data Import/Export
Basic Reports
Online Customer Support
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
GitHub
ITQlick rating
4.8/5
Score
91/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$4 per user/month
Functionality
16
Review
Compare
Bitbucket
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
88/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$3 per user/month
Functionality
4
Stackify
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
5/10
License pricing
$35 per server/month
Functionality
14
Anypoint...
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
91/100
Pricing
8/10
License pricing
$80,000 per year
Functionality
3
KOHEZION
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
90/100
Pricing
4.6/10
License pricing
$125 per 5 users/month
Functionality
3

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.