Compare Hint and Aurora - Jan 2024

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Jan 20, 2024

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Hint or Aurora?

Aurora is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Hint, and Aurora is rated with the same score (82/100) as Hint (82/100). Aurora offers users more features (2) than Hint (1). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Aurora!

Looking for the right Electronic Medical Records solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Hint Health Vs. Boston Advanced Analytics

Hint Health: Nestled in the vibrant tech ecosystem of San Francisco, California, Hint Health was founded in 2013 as a disruptive force in the healthcare industry. Hint Health offers a revolutionary platform designed to empower healthcare providers to break free from the constraints of the traditional fee-for-service model and embrace the more patient-centric wo...

Boston Advanced Analytics: Boston Advanced Analytics (Previously Coping Systems, Inc.) specializes in healthcare IT solutions - dedicated to helping both researchers and providers reduce cost while continuously improving quality of care, patient safety and treatment outcomes.

Who is more expensive? Hint Health or Aurora Clinical?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Electronic Medical Records software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Hint Health and Aurora Clinical.

Hint Health accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Hint Health is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Electronic Medical Records software. Aurora Clinical accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Hint Health is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Electronic Medical Records software.

Bottom line: Hint Health cost is around the same cost of Aurora Clinical.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Hint Vs. Aurora based on some of the most important and required Electronic Medical Records features.

Hint Health: Medical.

Aurora Clinical: BSA Compliance, FCRA Compliance.

Target customer size

Hint Health primarily serves healthcare providers and organizations looking to adopt healthcare membership models and transition away from traditional fee-for-service models. and Aurora Clinical's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.



Hint Health

ITQlick rating
(4.3/5)

Hint Health serves a wide array of healthcare providers, from small, independent practices to large medical groups and direct primary care (DPC) practices. It is a game-changer for those seeking to transition t...

Categories: Billing Management, Electronic Medical Records, Patient Management, Membership Management.

Aurora Clinical

ITQlick rating
(4/5)

Boston Advanced Analytics provides hospital-based clinics and researchers with electronic health record software engineered specifically for practitioners. Built in clinical and treatment specific workflows wit...

Categories: Org Chart, Compliance , Appointment Scheduling.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Hint Health: 1 Features

Medical

Aurora Clinical: 2 Features

BSA Compliance
FCRA Compliance
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Hint
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
5
Review
Compare
Aurora
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
5
Review
DoctorHelper®
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$199 per provider/month
Functionality
3
FreeMED
ITQlick rating
3/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
5
Medsphere
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
18

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.