Compare HORIZON LIMS and Clinical Conductor CTMS - Mar 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - HORIZON LIMS or Clinical Conductor CTMS?

Clinical Conductor CTMS is more expensive to implement (TCO) than HORIZON LIMS, and HORIZON LIMS is rated higher (74/100) than Clinical Conductor CTMS (54/100).

Looking for the right Clinical Trial Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

ChemWare Vs. Bio-Optronics

ChemWare: Since 1987, ChemWare (www.chemware.com) has been providing mission-critical information management solutions for many of the world's most highly automated environmental and human health & safety laboratories. Headquartered in Raleigh, NC, ChemWare is owned by Dohmen Life Science Services, an outsourced services company founded in 1858. ChemWare has...

Bio-Optronics: Bio-Optronics, Inc. is a leading healthcare software and service provider with over 30 years of industry experience. Bio-Optronics has a long and successful history working with healthcare organizations worldwide and producing a variety of products aimed at meeting their specific needs. Clinical Conductor CTMS, the market leading clinical trial man...

Who is more expensive? HORIZON LIMS or Clinical Conductor CTMS?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Clinical Trial Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for HORIZON LIMS and Clinical Conductor CTMS.

HORIZON LIMS accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 HORIZON LIMS is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Clinical Trial Management software. Clinical Conductor CTMS accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 HORIZON LIMS is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Clinical Trial Management software.

Bottom line: HORIZON LIMS cost is around the same cost of Clinical Conductor CTMS.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared HORIZON LIMS Vs. Clinical Conductor CTMS based on some of the most important and required Clinical Trial Management features.

HORIZON LIMS: We are still working to collect the list of features for HORIZON LIMS.

Clinical Conductor CTMS: We are still working to collect the list of features for Clinical Conductor CTMS.

Target customer size

HORIZON LIMS's typical customers include: SMBs, The typical customers of Clinical Conductor CTMS software are the clinicians/researchers in small to medium-sized clinical research setting that employs the services from the information technology and data hosting, mainly with CTMS and healthcare setting.