Compare iTrak and FCS-live - Mar 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - iTrak or FCS-live?

iTrak is more expensive to implement (TCO) than FCS-live, and iTrak is rated higher (92/100) than FCS-live (62/100).

Looking for the right EHS Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

NeoSystems Vs. FCS-live

NeoSystems: NeoSystems has quickly become one of Canada’s leading provider of QHSE solutions. Headquartered in Calgary, Alberta, NeoSystems has served clients across North America and Europe with cost-effective and configurable business solutions that are quick to implement and intuitive to use. Our world-class Quality, Health, Safety & Environment (QHSE/EHS) ...

FCS-live: Through a powerful combination of Innovation, Expertise and Technology, FCS-live has created the UK’s leading online risk management system. This Software can be licenced on a white label version or sold as a service and completed by our qualified team of Risk Assessors throughout the UK and now Internationally. FCS-live is proud to say this softwa...

Who is more expensive? iTrak or FCS-live?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of EHS Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for iTrak and FCS-live.

iTrak accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 iTrak is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of EHS Management software. FCS-live accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 iTrak is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of EHS Management software.

Bottom line: iTrak cost is around the same cost of FCS-live.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared iTrak Vs. FCS-live based on some of the most important and required EHS Management features.

iTrak : We are still working to collect the list of features for iTrak .

FCS-live: We are still working to collect the list of features for FCS-live.

Target customer size

iTrak 's typical customers include: SMBs, and FCS-live's target customer size include: SMBs.