iTrak is a growing cloud-based EHS Management software, it is designed to support small and medium size business. iTrak received a rating of 3.1 from ITQlick team. The software cost is considered average (2....
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Q EHS is more expensive to implement (TCO) than iTrak, and iTrak is rated higher (92/100) than Q EHS (62/100).
Looking for the right EHS Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
NeoSystems: NeoSystems has quickly become one of Canada’s leading provider of QHSE solutions. Headquartered in Calgary, Alberta, NeoSystems has served clients across North America and Europe with cost-effective and configurable business solutions that are quick to implement and intuitive to use. Our world-class Quality, Health, Safety & Environment (QHSE/EHS) ...
Quantum Compliance Systems: ...
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of EHS Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for iTrak and Q EHS.
iTrak accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 iTrak is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of EHS Management software. Q EHS accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 iTrak is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of EHS Management software.
Bottom line: Q EHS is more expensive than iTrak .
We've compared iTrak Vs. Q EHS based on some of the most important and required EHS Management features.
iTrak : We are still working to collect the list of features for iTrak .
Q EHS: We are still working to collect the list of features for Q EHS.
iTrak 's typical customers include: SMBs, and Q EHS's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.
iTrak is a growing cloud-based EHS Management software, it is designed to support small and medium size business. iTrak received a rating of 3.1 from ITQlick team. The software cost is considered average (2....
Compare Pricing
Q EHS is a growing cloud-based EHS Management software, it is designed to support small, medium and large size business. Q EHS received a rating of 3.8 from ITQlick team. The software cost is considered average...
Compare PricingITQlick Score: | 92/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
Category: | EHS Management -> iTrak review |
Company: | NeoSystems |
Typical customers: | SMBs |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile |
Links: | iTrak review, iTrak pricing, iTrak alternatives |
ITQlick Score: | 62/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
Category: | EHS Management -> Q EHS review |
Company: | Quantum Compliance Systems |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop |
Links: | Q EHS review, Q EHS pricing, Q EHS alternatives |
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.