Compare KPI Fire and deFacto Planning - Jun 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - KPI Fire or deFacto Planning?

deFacto Planning is more expensive to implement (TCO) than KPI Fire, and KPI Fire is rated higher (83/100) than deFacto Planning (75/100). KPI Fire offers users more features (6) than deFacto Planning (4). There is a clear winner in this case and it is KPI Fire!

Looking for the right Strategic Planning solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

KPI Fire Vs. deFacto Global

KPI Fire: KPI Fire is the only cloud based enterprise solution for managing the 3 key elements of Strategy Deployment. Strategy | Execution | People KPI Fire makes your strategic plan visual and easy for everyone to understand. Everyone at KPI Fire is passionate about one thing, helping companies execute their strategy. We engage and align people aroun...

deFacto Global: The best managed organizations work from a single version of the truth, clearly understand their business reality, and make accurate and timely decisions based on financial and operational facts.

Who is more expensive? KPI Fire or deFacto Planning?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Strategic Planning software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for KPI Fire and deFacto Planning.

KPI Fire price starts at $20 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 KPI Fire is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Strategic Planning software. deFacto Planning accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 KPI Fire is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Strategic Planning software.

Bottom line: deFacto Planning is more expensive than KPI Fire.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared KPI Fire Vs. deFacto Planning based on some of the most important and required Strategic Planning features.

KPI Fire: Dashboard, Ad-Hoc Analysis, Ad-Hoc Reporting, Dashboards & KPIs, Business performance management, Budgeting & CPM.

deFacto Planning: Dashboard, Dashboards & KPIs, "What If" Scenarios, Budgeting & CPM.

Target customer size

KPI Fire's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and deFacto Planning's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.