Compare Oracle Asset and Hardcat Asset Tracking - May 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Oracle Asset or Hardcat Asset Tracking?

Oracle Asset is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Hardcat Asset Tracking, and Oracle Asset is rated higher (74/100) than Hardcat Asset Tracking (62/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.

Looking for the right Fixed Asset Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Oracle Corporation Vs. Hardcat

Oracle Corporation: Oracle Corporation is a computer technology corporation that specializes in developing and marketing computer hardware systems and enterprise software products – particularly database management systems. Employing approximately 113,644 people worldwide as of 30 June 2012,it has enlarged its share of the software market through organic growth and th...

Hardcat: Hardcat Pty Ltd and its wholly owned subsidiaries Hardcat Inc. (USA) and Hardcat Limited (UK) are widely regarded as a world leader in fixed asset management.Hardcat was founded by current Managing Director and President Dan Drum in Melbourne, Australia in 1986. With its innovative new products gaining immediate market acceptance the company grew r...

Who is more expensive? Oracle Asset or Hardcat Asset Tracking?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Fixed Asset Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Oracle Asset and Hardcat Asset Tracking.

Oracle Asset accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Oracle Asset Management is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Fixed Asset Management software. Hardcat Asset Tracking price starts at $3,000 per license , When comparing Hardcat Asset Tracking to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Fixed Asset Management software cost.

Bottom line: Oracle Asset is more expensive than Hardcat Asset Tracking.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Oracle Asset Vs. Hardcat Asset Tracking based on some of the most important and required Fixed Asset Management features.

Oracle Asset: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

Hardcat Asset Tracking: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

Target customer size

Oracle Asset Management is an extensive solution specifically designed for the needs of large enterprise networks, although it can also be used for the needs of medium businesses. and Hardcat Asset Tracking's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.