Compare PatientStudio and Aurora - Jun 2023

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Jun 14, 2023

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - PatientStudio or Aurora?

Aurora is more expensive to implement (TCO) than PatientStudio, and Aurora is rated with the same score (82/100) as PatientStudio (82/100). PatientStudio offers users more features (3) than Aurora (2). There is a clear winner in this case and it is PatientStudio!

Looking for the right Electronic Medical Records solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

PatientStudio Vs. Boston Advanced Analytics

PatientStudio: PatientStudio is a patient engagement platform that aims to streamline the healthcare experience. It offers features such as online appointment scheduling, secure messaging, digital intake forms, and telehealth capabilities. With its user-friendly interface and robust functionality, PatientStudio helps healthcare providers enhance patient communica...

Boston Advanced Analytics: Boston Advanced Analytics (Previously Coping Systems, Inc.) specializes in healthcare IT solutions - dedicated to helping both researchers and providers reduce cost while continuously improving quality of care, patient safety and treatment outcomes.

Who is more expensive? PatientStudio or Aurora Clinical?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Electronic Medical Records software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for PatientStudio and Aurora Clinical.

PatientStudio accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 PatientStudio is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Electronic Medical Records software. Aurora Clinical accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 PatientStudio is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Electronic Medical Records software.

Bottom line: PatientStudio cost is around the same cost of Aurora Clinical.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared PatientStudio Vs. Aurora based on some of the most important and required Electronic Medical Records features.

PatientStudio: Billing & Invoicing, Medical, Scheduling.

Aurora Clinical: BSA Compliance, FCRA Compliance.

Target customer size

PatientStudio serves a diverse range of customers in the healthcare industry, including medical practices, clinics, hospitals, and healthcare systems. and Aurora Clinical's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.



PatientStudio

ITQlick rating
(5/5)

PatientStudio is an integrated EMR, practice management, and billing software that helps healthcare providers streamline their workflow and improve the patient experience. The software offers a wide range of fe...

Categories: Billing & Invoicing, E-Prescribing, Electronic Health Records (EHR), Electronic Medical Records.

Aurora Clinical

ITQlick rating
(4/5)

Boston Advanced Analytics provides hospital-based clinics and researchers with electronic health record software engineered specifically for practitioners. Built in clinical and treatment specific workflows wit...

Categories: Org Chart, Compliance , Appointment Scheduling.

Compare specifications

Compare features

PatientStudio: 3 Features

Billing & Invoicing
Medical
Scheduling

Aurora Clinical: 2 Features

BSA Compliance
FCRA Compliance
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
PatientStudio
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
10
Compare
Aurora
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
5
Review
DoctorHelper®
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$199 per provider/month
Functionality
3
FreeMED
ITQlick rating
3/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
5
Medsphere
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
18

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.