Compare Pics.io and GitHub - Aug 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Pics.io or GitHub?

Pics.io is more expensive to implement (TCO) than GitHub, and GitHub is rated higher (91/100) than Pics.io (69/100). GitHub offers users more features (6) than Pics.io (3). There is a clear winner in this case and it is GitHub!

Looking for the right Digital Asset Management (DAM) solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Pics.io Vs. GitHub

Pics.io: Pics.io is a complete solution for managing all your digital assets. Quickly find any of your creative files, collaborate with colleagues on new projects, and share your work with clients and partners. And since it's built on top of Google Drive, Pics.io is secure, reliable, and offers unlimited storage.

GitHub: GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together. With the collaborative features of GitHub.com, our desktop and mobile apps, and GitHub Enterprise, it has never been easier for individuals and teams to write better code, fas...

Who is more expensive? Pics.io or GitHub?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Digital Asset Management (DAM) software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Pics.io and GitHub.

Pics.io price starts at $11 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Pics.io is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Digital Asset Management (DAM) software. GitHub price starts at $4 per user/month , When comparing GitHub to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Digital Asset Management (DAM) software cost.

Bottom line: Pics.io cost is around the same cost of GitHub.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Pics.io Vs. GitHub based on some of the most important and required Digital Asset Management (DAM) features.

Pics.io: Version Control, Workflow, Remote Access.

GitHub: Basic Reports, Customizable Reporting, Data Import/Export, Online Customer Support, Data Analysis Tools.

Target customer size

Pics.io's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and a variety of types, including new startups.