Compare PX3000 and bswift - Mar 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - PX3000 or bswift?

bswift is more expensive to implement (TCO) than PX3000, and PX3000 is rated higher (90/100) than bswift (78/100). bswift offers users more features (2) than PX3000 (0).

Looking for the right Benefits Administration solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Penad Pension Services Vs. bswift

Penad Pension Services: Founded in 1983, Penad is Canada’s pension administration specialist and a leading supplier of pension and benefit software systems to employers, financial institutions, and governments around the world. Penad takes care of the pension needs of plan sponsors across Canada and internationally with first-tier plan administration, consulting and ac...

bswift: Bswift Inc., a Chicago-based benefits consulting and information technology services firm, on Tuesday announced the launch of its private health and voluntary benefits exchange, Springboard Marketplace. Springboard Marketplace offers large and midsize employers a greater degree of control over their group benefits budgets by allowing them to set...

Who is more expensive? PX3000 or bswift?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Benefits Administration software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for PX3000 and bswift.

PX3000 accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 PX3000 is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Benefits Administration software. bswift accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 PX3000 is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Benefits Administration software.

Bottom line: bswift is more expensive than PX3000.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared PX3000 Vs. bswift based on some of the most important and required Benefits Administration features.

PX3000: We are still working to collect the list of features for PX3000.

bswift: Benefits Administration, Employee Self-Service.

Target customer size

PX3000's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, The software is a useful solution for businesses of all sizes hailing from a variety of industries.