Compare Pype and COOR - May 2023

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / May 12, 2023

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Pype or COOR?

COOR is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Pype, and COOR is rated with the same score (82/100) as Pype (82/100). COOR offers users more features (6) than Pype (4). There is a clear winner in this case and it is COOR!

Looking for the right Construction Project Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Autodesk Inc. Vs. COOR

Autodesk Inc.: Autodesk Inc., (NASDAQ: ADSK) has completed the acquisition of Qontext,enterprise social collaboration software, from India-based Pramati Technologies. The acquisition of the Qontext technology and development team will accelerate Autodesk’s ongoing move to the cloud and expansion of social capabilities in the Autodesk 360 cloud-based service. Term...

COOR: Coor is a cloud-based project management software designed for the construction industry. It provides tools to manage projects, documents, communication, and collaboration between project team members, including clients, architects, engineers, and contractors.

Who is more expensive? Pype AutoSpecs or COOR?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Construction Project Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Pype AutoSpecs and COOR.

Pype AutoSpecs accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Pype AutoSpecs is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Construction Project Management software. COOR accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Pype AutoSpecs is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Construction Project Management software.

Bottom line: Pype AutoSpecs cost is around the same cost of COOR.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Pype Vs. COOR based on some of the most important and required Construction Project Management features.

Pype AutoSpecs: Collaboration, Project Management, Project Collaboration, Issue Management.

COOR: Project Management, Project Budgeting, Costing, Dashboard, Contract Management.

Target customer size

Pype AutoSpecs is primarily designed for the construction industry, specifically for general contractors and subcontractors who need to review and extract information from project specifications.

Coor is a project management software that is designed for the construction industry.



Pype AutoSpecs

ITQlick rating
(4.3/5)

Pype AutoSpecs is a powerful construction project management software that helps general contractors and subcontractors automate the tedious process of project specifications review. It was established in 2015 ...

Categories: Project Management, Issue Management, Project Reporting, Project Collaboration.

COOR

ITQlick rating
(5/5)

Coor is a cloud-based project management software that has been making waves in the construction industry. This innovative platform provides a variety of tools that can help construction project teams manage th...

Categories: Costing, Dashboards & KPIs, Reporting, Construction Project Management, Contract Management.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Pype AutoSpecs: 4 Features

Collaboration
Project Management
Project Collaboration
Issue Management

COOR: 6 Features

Project Management
Project Budgeting
Costing
Dashboard
Contract Management
Ad-Hoc Analysis
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Pype
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
8
Review
Compare
COOR
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
12
Review
Compare
Autodesk
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$700 per year
Functionality
9
Touchplan
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$590 per month
Functionality
9
Wrench
ITQlick rating
4.8/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$34.95 per month
Functionality
13
Review

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.