Shlomi Lavi /
Mar 19, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - RazorSync or SAP Field Service?
SAP Field Service is more expensive to implement (TCO) than RazorSync, and RazorSync is rated higher (91/100) than SAP Field Service (56/100). RazorSync offers users more features (8) than SAP Field Service (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is RazorSync!
Looking for the right Field Service solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
RazorSync Vs. SAP
RazorSync: RazorSync, LLC is a Minneapolis, MN based company that provides a powerful, easy-to-use, and low-cost mobile-to-cloud (MOCLO) field service software for service businesses.
The RazorSync desktop and mobile software solution streamlines business management and the interaction between the office, field workers and customers. This application helps ...
SAP: SAP ® AG is German software corporation that makes enterprise software to manage business operations and customer relations. SAP ® is the market leader in enterprise application software. The company's best-known software products are its enterprise resource planning application (SAP ® ERP), its enterpr...
Who is more expensive? RazorSync or SAP Field Service?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Field Service software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for RazorSync and SAP Field Service.
RazorSync price starts at $55 per 2 users/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 RazorSync is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Field Service software. SAP Field Service accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 RazorSync is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Field Service software.
Bottom line: RazorSync cost is around the same cost of SAP Field Service.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared RazorSync Vs. SAP Field Service based on some of the most important and required Field Service features.
RazorSync: Dashboard, Data Import/Export, Billing & Invoicing, Employee Scheduling, Time Tracking, Scheduling, Work Order Management, Contract Management.
SAP Field Service: We are still working to collect the list of features for SAP Field Service.
Target customer size
RazorSync's typical customers include: Small businesses and start ups, and SAP Field Service's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.