Compare riskcloud-NET and iTrak - Jun 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - riskcloud-NET or iTrak?

iTrak is more expensive to implement (TCO) than riskcloud-NET, and iTrak is rated higher (92/100) than riskcloud-NET (62/100).

Looking for the right EHS Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

PAN Software Vs. NeoSystems

PAN Software: PAN Software is a specialist information technology consultancy and product development company based in Melbourne, Australia. We provide project management, business analysis, software development, testing and specialist technical expertise to deliver successful software solutions. As a specialist product development company, we design, develop, d...

NeoSystems: NeoSystems has quickly become one of Canada’s leading provider of QHSE solutions. Headquartered in Calgary, Alberta, NeoSystems has served clients across North America and Europe with cost-effective and configurable business solutions that are quick to implement and intuitive to use. Our world-class Quality, Health, Safety & Environment (QHSE/EHS) ...

Who is more expensive? riskcloud-NET or iTrak ?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of EHS Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for riskcloud-NET and iTrak .

riskcloud-NET accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 riskcloud-NET is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of EHS Management software. iTrak accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 riskcloud-NET is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of EHS Management software.

Bottom line: riskcloud-NET cost is around the same cost of iTrak .

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared riskcloud-NET Vs. iTrak based on some of the most important and required EHS Management features.

riskcloud-NET: We are still working to collect the list of features for riskcloud-NET.

iTrak : We are still working to collect the list of features for iTrak .

Target customer size

riskcloud-NET's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and iTrak 's target customer size include: SMBs.