Compare RIVS and iCams - Jun 2022
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - RIVS or iCams?
iCams is more expensive to implement (TCO) than RIVS, and RIVS is rated higher (83/100) than iCams (77/100).
Looking for the right Video Interview solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
RIVS Vs. Hireserve Limited
RIVS: Our clients use our services to improve their quality of hire and reduce hiring costs by leveraging digital interviews to get better candidate information sooner and with less effort. Digital interviews make it possible to evaluate skills and attitudes that usually don't appear on a resume, reducing the time spent interviewing by 60% while allowin...
Hireserve Limited: Established in 1997, Hireserve Limited is an e-recruitment software specialist. The company provides online applicant tracking recruitment solutions for a variety of multinational, small and medium sized enterprises and not-for-profit organisations across the UK and Europe. With over 15 years’ experience of providing e-recruitment, our expert, ...
Who is more expensive? RIVS or iCams?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Video Interview software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for RIVS and iCams.
RIVS accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 RIVS is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Video Interview software. iCams accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 RIVS is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Video Interview software.
Bottom line: RIVS cost is around the same cost of iCams.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared RIVS Vs. iCams based on some of the most important and required Video Interview features.
RIVS: We are still working to collect the list of features for RIVS.
iCams: We are still working to collect the list of features for iCams.
Target customer size
Customers of the software include small and medium businesses as well as large enterprises. The software is a useful solution for small and medium businesses as well as large enterprises.
Compare specifications
RIVS Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 83/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Video Interview -> RIVS review |
Company: | RIVS |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | RIVS review, RIVS pricing, RIVS alternatives |
iCams Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 77/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Video Interview -> iCams review |
Company: | Hireserve Limited |
Typical customers: | Medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile |
Links: | iCams review, iCams pricing, iCams alternatives |
Compare features
RIVS: 0 Features
iCams: 0 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.