Compare Sonic XML Server and Mule ESB - Mar 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Sonic XML Server or Mule ESB?

Sonic XML Server is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Mule ESB, and Mule ESB is rated higher (90/100) than Sonic XML Server (52/100). Mule ESB offers users more features (5) than Sonic XML Server (3). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Mule ESB!

Looking for the right Data Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Progress Software Corporation Vs. Mulesoft

Progress Software Corporation : Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) is a global software company that simplifies the development, deployment and management of business applications on-premise or on any Cloud, on any platform and on any device with minimal IT complexity and low total cost of ownership.

Mulesoft: MuleSoft provides the most widely used integration platform for connecting SaaS and enterprise applications in the cloud and on-premise With the rise of cloud and mobile, enterprises face a choice: become overwhelmed by the resulting explosion of end points or seize the opportunity to gain competitive advantage. Founded on the idea that connecti...

Who is more expensive? Sonic XML Server or Mule ESB?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Data Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Sonic XML Server and Mule ESB.

Sonic XML Server accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Sonic XML Server is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Data Management software. Mule ESB price starts at $80,000 per year , When comparing Mule ESB to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Data Management software cost.

Bottom line: Sonic XML Server is more expensive than Mule ESB.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Sonic XML Server Vs. Mule ESB based on some of the most important and required Data Management features.

Sonic XML Server: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

Mule ESB: 24/7 Telephone Support, API, Mobile Access, Online Customer Support, Telephone Customer Support.

Target customer size

Sonic XML Server's typical customers include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business, Mule ESB is best for large enterprises as well as small to large businesses across several industries including retail, government, media and telecommunications, healthcare, and insurance.