Shlomi Lavi / Sep 03, 2020
We publish unbiased reviews, our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more in our advertiser disclosure.
SugarSync is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Google drive, Google drive is rated higher (99/100) than SugarSync (82/100).
Looking for the right File Sharing solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:
SugarSync: SugarSync is a free service that helps you sync your life. With a simple download on your computers and mobile devices, you have access to all the Cloud has to offer. SugarSync currently has millions of users worldwide. Brands such as BestBuy, Lenovo, SanDisk, France Telecom-Orange, Korea Telecom and more have selected SugarSync as a partner to bri...
Google: Google Inc. is an American corporation which provides Internet-related products and services, including internet search, cloud computing, software and advertisingtechnologies.[6] Advertising revenues from AdWords generate almost all of the company's profits.
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of File Sharing software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for SugarSync and Google drive.
SugarSync price starts at $7.49 per user/month , on a scale between 1 to 10 SugarSync is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of File Sharing software. Google drive price starts at $1.99 per month , when comparing Google drive to their competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average File Sharing software cost.
Bottom line: SugarSync is more expensive than Google drive.
As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared SugarSync Vs. Google drive based on some of the most important and required File Sharing features. SugarSync: We are still working to collect the list of features for SugarSync. Google drive: We are still working to collect the list of features for Google drive.
SugarSync's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and Google drive's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.
starts at $7.49 per user/month
SugarSync is a growing cloud-based Document Management software, it is designed to support small, medium and large size business. SugarSync received a rating of 4.9 from ITQlick team. The software cost is consi...
Compare Pricingstarts at $1.99 per month
Google Drive software is a cloud-hosted file sharing and storage software solution that offers cloud backup and storage for docs, files, photos and more. It enables the users to access their files from anywhere...
Compare Pricing| ITQlick Score: | 82/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: | (4.9/5) |
| Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
| Category: | File Sharing -> SugarSync |
| Company: | SugarSync |
| Pricing: | starts at $7.49 per user/month |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
| Links: | SugarSync review, SugarSync pricing, SugarSync alternatives |
| ITQlick Score: | 99/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: | (4.8/5) |
| Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
| Category: | File Sharing -> Google drive |
| Company: | |
| Pricing: | starts at $1.99 per month |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Mobile, Cloud |
| Links: | Google drive review, Google drive pricing, Google drive alternatives |
Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.