Shlomi Lavi /
Apr 22, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Textura or Flowdock?
Flowdock is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Textura, and Textura is rated higher (90/100) than Flowdock (79/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.
Looking for the right Team Collaboration solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Textura Corporation Vs. Flowdock
Textura Corporation: ...
Flowdock: Flowdock is a collaboration tool for technical teams. It’s real-time and super-integrated, something Google Wave could have been. Teams using Flowdock stay up-to-date, react in seconds instead of hours, and never forget anything.
We partner with companies like Atlassian and Zendesk to provide seamless integration experiences.
The founders hav...
Who is more expensive? Textura or Flowdock?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Team Collaboration software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Textura and Flowdock.
Textura price starts at $250 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 Textura is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Team Collaboration software. Flowdock price starts at $3 per user/month , When comparing Flowdock to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Team Collaboration software cost.
Bottom line: Textura cost is around the same cost of Flowdock.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Textura Vs. Flowdock based on some of the most important and required Team Collaboration features.
Textura: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Flowdock: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Target customer size
Textura CPM Enterprise is suitable for large general contractor, developers and owners that are looking
for a construction payment management solution. Flowdock is suitable for software development and business teams that are looking for a way to have real-time conversations with team members and streamline the planning process.